Here is why I disagree. When FB launched amid a flurry of excitement I simply asked one question: Is it possible to get something for nothing by connecting to unknown people?
The answer was and is no. Therefore never spent 3 mins of valuable time on FB or Instagram. I did not drink the kool aid and am not interested in the fix it from within idea or what suitable reparations resemble. Never used the "platform" never will.
That was the right decision, then and now.
It was never wise to picnic on the railroad tracks... and feign surprise at the oncoming train...
Great post and neither have I used their platform, but many, many sheepie have and now more will follow. They know not that they are supporting our greatest enemies.
Ironically what goes around comes around. Both of those sites are "fully against" censorship, that is unless they are the ones doing the censoring. While I do not consider them to be bad sites, they both have this belief of "Do as I say, not as I do"; and that does not sit well with me. They both need to seriously stop with their own censorship; then they can point to X and other platforms without being hypocritical.
"What is Mercola censoring?" Good question; their vague notice leaves it up to the recipient to guess. Albeit, I believe their use of the word "contribution", refers to an unspecified post that likely promoted some health issue. In this case you also get to guess , because their notice in its entirety is as follows:
"For over a quarter of a century, this site has aimed to equip you with information to take charge of your health. We recognize, however, that not everyone has been able to apply this knowledge personally, often due to circumstances beyond their control or responsibility. Moving forward, our focus will shift towards providing content that empowers you to make informed decisions for fostering health and joy in your life. Our goal is to foster a supportive community where everyone can safely explore and learn these principles."
"Regarding your recent contribution, it does not align with our site's renewed focus, and as a result, you will be temporarily banned for one day. Should there be future posts from you that do not adhere to our guidelines, the duration of bans will increase progressively: a week for the next instance, followed by a month, three months, six months, and then a year. A violation after a one-year ban will lead to a permanent ban from the site."
He "started social media to give people a voice"??? Um, NO. Facebook was started for young men to gossip about young women. It grew into social media because people used it as such and it spread. Mark Z rode the horse where it led and monetized it.
Mark is just trying to jump on the Trump bandwagon before it is too late for him. People have moved and are moving to alternative media because of his censorship. The fact checkers were not "too political" on their own, they were put there in the first place to be just that. He is running damage control now, and hoping people will buy the BS he's spewing while trying to look sincere and contrite.
He has not suddenly become a better person; he is not looking to right wrongs; he is not trustworthy. He is still out for himself; to control people and harvest their data for his own benefit.
It is so nice to see posters such as yourself that can see so clearly through his BS and not be swayed by all his fancy words of "enlightenment". Now if only everyone had eyes to see!
Zuckerberg is the only $ellebrity who isn’t appearing to be AGING. Is this another DEEP FAKE video from the Deeep $tater$ poly-trick-all propagandist$ ?
I don't trust him one single bit. He's up to no good along with all of the 'billionaires' including Elon. Elon is not 'one of us'. He's pretending to be
He isn't fooling you and he isn't fooling me. And yes Elon is not 'one of us'. If you want 'one of us' look to Dr Malone and Thomas Massie. They literally have their hands in the soil and have our back.
The absurdity of deplatforming GREENMEDINFO will not be able to withstand the forces as we go forward. If posters make enough noise this travesty can be quickly put to rest. The squeaky wheel gets the grease, so lets make some noise.
GREAT CHANGES are a coming and that can not be denied; and from an individual that would just as readily shake your hand or stab you in the back solely on what would provide him with the most power and money. If you are naive enough to believe his BS, then you probably believe that zebras can change their stripes. His fancy words do not alter who he is, but the new direction we are heading into has forced his hand to align with that direction. There may be some foot dragging, thus GREENMEDINFO may not initially benefit, but you will likely see GREAT CHANGES.
Here is why I disagree. When FB launched amid a flurry of excitement I simply asked one question: Is it possible to get something for nothing by connecting to unknown people?
The answer was and is no. Therefore never spent 3 mins of valuable time on FB or Instagram. I did not drink the kool aid and am not interested in the fix it from within idea or what suitable reparations resemble. Never used the "platform" never will.
That was the right decision, then and now.
It was never wise to picnic on the railroad tracks... and feign surprise at the oncoming train...
Great post and neither have I used their platform, but many, many sheepie have and now more will follow. They know not that they are supporting our greatest enemies.
X is also STILL banning certain sites, like Mercola and Brighteon...
Ironically what goes around comes around. Both of those sites are "fully against" censorship, that is unless they are the ones doing the censoring. While I do not consider them to be bad sites, they both have this belief of "Do as I say, not as I do"; and that does not sit well with me. They both need to seriously stop with their own censorship; then they can point to X and other platforms without being hypocritical.
What is Mercola censoring? Note, I do not agree with everything he is saying, just not aware about his doing the censoring.
"What is Mercola censoring?" Good question; their vague notice leaves it up to the recipient to guess. Albeit, I believe their use of the word "contribution", refers to an unspecified post that likely promoted some health issue. In this case you also get to guess , because their notice in its entirety is as follows:
"For over a quarter of a century, this site has aimed to equip you with information to take charge of your health. We recognize, however, that not everyone has been able to apply this knowledge personally, often due to circumstances beyond their control or responsibility. Moving forward, our focus will shift towards providing content that empowers you to make informed decisions for fostering health and joy in your life. Our goal is to foster a supportive community where everyone can safely explore and learn these principles."
"Regarding your recent contribution, it does not align with our site's renewed focus, and as a result, you will be temporarily banned for one day. Should there be future posts from you that do not adhere to our guidelines, the duration of bans will increase progressively: a week for the next instance, followed by a month, three months, six months, and then a year. A violation after a one-year ban will lead to a permanent ban from the site."
He "started social media to give people a voice"??? Um, NO. Facebook was started for young men to gossip about young women. It grew into social media because people used it as such and it spread. Mark Z rode the horse where it led and monetized it.
Mark is just trying to jump on the Trump bandwagon before it is too late for him. People have moved and are moving to alternative media because of his censorship. The fact checkers were not "too political" on their own, they were put there in the first place to be just that. He is running damage control now, and hoping people will buy the BS he's spewing while trying to look sincere and contrite.
He has not suddenly become a better person; he is not looking to right wrongs; he is not trustworthy. He is still out for himself; to control people and harvest their data for his own benefit.
It is so nice to see posters such as yourself that can see so clearly through his BS and not be swayed by all his fancy words of "enlightenment". Now if only everyone had eyes to see!
Zuckerberg is the only $ellebrity who isn’t appearing to be AGING. Is this another DEEP FAKE video from the Deeep $tater$ poly-trick-all propagandist$ ?
You started with and FOR the Sociopath$ and Psychopath$ in the CIA. It’s obvious you, an ACTOR, still love their money-for-surveillance.
A bit of double speak….BS??
I don't trust him one single bit. He's up to no good along with all of the 'billionaires' including Elon. Elon is not 'one of us'. He's pretending to be
He isn't fooling you and he isn't fooling me. And yes Elon is not 'one of us'. If you want 'one of us' look to Dr Malone and Thomas Massie. They literally have their hands in the soil and have our back.
The absurdity of deplatforming GREENMEDINFO will not be able to withstand the forces as we go forward. If posters make enough noise this travesty can be quickly put to rest. The squeaky wheel gets the grease, so lets make some noise.
GREAT CHANGES are a coming and that can not be denied; and from an individual that would just as readily shake your hand or stab you in the back solely on what would provide him with the most power and money. If you are naive enough to believe his BS, then you probably believe that zebras can change their stripes. His fancy words do not alter who he is, but the new direction we are heading into has forced his hand to align with that direction. There may be some foot dragging, thus GREENMEDINFO may not initially benefit, but you will likely see GREAT CHANGES.