19 Comments
User's avatar
Ionedery2's avatar

I think you could be a great lawyer Sayer. You summed it up nicely

Expand full comment
Leskunque Lepew's avatar

I wonder who is paying for Ahmeds representation? He is not a citizen of the US. But, he is a tool of Transnational gangsters assaulting the constitution. Why is he here? Who allowed him in? Who is protecting him?

Persona Non Grata..?

Expand full comment
Steve  Mitzner's avatar

WE [after a fair trial] based his Islamic "law", to cut off his infidel / anti-American head as mentioned in his Koran! Then Ahmed could have the benefit of both nations' law!

Remember, a "good" devout Muslim is bound to convert you or kill you! I.e., "Death to infidels," despite their devout, "Taqiyya" lying/ a strategic prudence and self-preservation!

Expand full comment
TriTorch's avatar

"Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself." ―Salman Rushdie

"No right was deemed by the fathers of the government more sacred than the right of speech. It was in their eyes, as in the eyes of all thoughtful men, the great moral renovator of society and government." ―Frederick Douglass

―Because without it, "dumb and silent we will be led like sheep to the slaughter." George Washington

Expand full comment
Steve  Mitzner's avatar

How silly of you to not understand the difference between inciting Godless woke leftists to kill what (they) call racist, Homophobic Nazis, like Trump or Charley Kirk (who was killed by a Quear whail disucing killer Quears!) (IF? I have the freedom to use the Queer word as in LGBTQIA+'s Q word? Without beeing shot?

Expand full comment
🌱Nard🙏's avatar

TriTorch, I am so happy you are BACK!

Expand full comment
TriTorch's avatar

Thanks 🌱Nard🙏=)

Expand full comment
JudyC's avatar

The complete hypocrisy of claiming First Amendment rights after brutally attacking that right for others is mind boggling. But how typical of the far left. Zero self awareness of the irony.

Expand full comment
Ro's avatar

Whilst I fully support Trump kicking Ahmed out, the consequence of this loathsome toad coming back to the U.K. is serious. He’s an instigator of black propaganda and is funded by the usual Left Wing sources, hiding behind anonymous gifts. He’s totally on side with the Left wing government we suffer from in the U.K.

Grok:

Imran Ahmed, as CEO and founder of the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), is funded through the organization’s donors. CCDH is a nonprofit with UK and US entities, and it has faced significant criticism for lack of transparency in its funding—often described by critics as relying on “dark money” via anonymous channels like donor-advised funds (DAFs).

Known Funding Sources

• Large anonymous donations: In 2021 (its first full US year), CCDH reported ~$1.47 million in revenue, including a $1.1 million anonymous gift routed through the Schwab Charitable Fund (a major DAF allowing donor anonymity).

• Other grants: In 2023, it received ~$403,000–$415,000 from the Silicon Valley Community Foundation/Skoll Fund-linked entities, and smaller amounts like $15,000 from the Hopewell Fund (managed by Arabella Advisors, a hub for left-leaning anonymous funding).

• UK-based philanthropic foundations: Earlier funding (around 2020) included the Pears Foundation, Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, Barrow Cadbury Trust, and Paul Hamlyn Foundation (e.g., £100,000 grant in 2021).

• Other identified or alleged sources: Reports link smaller or indirect funding to entities like Unbound Philanthropy (ties to Open Society Foundations/Ford Foundation executives), and some critics claim connections to Soros-linked networks (e.g., via Hopewell or similar pass-throughs), though CCDH does not confirm direct Soros funding.

• Anonymous channels: Much of CCDH’s UK funding flows through Prism the Gift Fund, a charity that enables permanent donor anonymity—critics cite up to 17 funders, many unnamed, using such mechanisms.

Criticisms and Denials

CCDH states on its website that it is funded by “philanthropic trusts and members of the public” and actively solicits DAF donations. It has denied receiving any U.S. government funds (e.g., in response to 2023 House Judiciary Committee inquiries) and claims a nonpartisan approach.

Critics (from right-leaning sources like InfluenceWatch, The Disinformation Chronicle, and congressional probes) argue the opacity hides ideological donors pushing censorship agendas, with anonymous DAFs shielding potentially foreign or partisan influences. CCDH does not voluntarily publish a full donor list, and its US IRS Form 990 filings disclose aggregate revenue but not individual donors.

In summary, while some foundations are publicly linked, a substantial portion appears to come from anonymous or obscured sources, fueling ongoing debates about accountability.

Can’t Trump exile the slug to Venezuela of Afghanistan.

Expand full comment
Laure Olson Friesen's avatar

Thank you for bringing this to the awareness of the citizens of the United States. Enough of the deception, enough of non-citizens having precedence over citizens in our country… 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Expand full comment
Alamo Dude's avatar

Lawfare vs Lawfare vs Lawfare, these Lawyers using word salad legalese to game a good faith system, is a classic example of why;

We should not allow Lawyers to have monopolies on State and Federal Goober$Mints, like under Otto Penn Joe or Obama. With 100% lawyer owned Executive and Judicial and 85% Legislative lawyers.

Now we know why Jesus warned us about Lawyers, their moral relativity training in law school to make $$$ where Truth is irrelevant, and the money laundering lawyer money changers Sanhedrin who crucified The Truth to keep their power, status and grifts going. Until they were destroyed in 70 AD as prophesied.

Proof that inalienable rights only come from God. Not from ‘natural law’, humans, nations, monarchs or oligarchs. Atheist Noko’s Bill of Rights is better on paper than America’s. If inalienable rights were from Natural Law, humanity would not have needed to wait 10,000 years of history for Americans to Declare them 250 years ago. And they would not need constantly defending by Patriots from psychopaths and sociopaths using Lawfare to game the system to bypass inalienable rights.

All 1D atheist Marxist systems proved to be abject failures. Now we can clearly see all 2D Socialist Fascist Marxist systems are also abject failures. And all tunnel vision Theocracies, like the 2D FlatLander apartheid theocracy in AngleLand that 3D common sense Americans escaped from all will end in Lawfared Tyranny also. Like the unconstitutional Lawfared Theocracy of Otto Penn Joseph Stolen, aka the third term of Obama. And their establishment of the Branch CoViDian American Religion of pseudo science Scientism. Where men can have babies, plant food is pollution, the healthy make the unhealthy sick, and experimental but Man Dated injections filled with graphene, nano plastics, aluminum, foreign DNA, mercury and biosynthetic modified RNA are safe and highly effective.

Perhaps 3D common sense means returning to the actual American First Amendment, defended by the Second Amendment. Of Freedom of Religion, never establishing a National Theocracy to be Lawfared into Tyranny, freedoms of speech, press and peaceful assembly to protest grievances with out provocateur rabble rousers and the Kabuki Moc~King-bird media street theater false flagging chaos to grab power.

God Bless and Protect America, 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

Expand full comment
Freedom Fox's avatar

I don't recall any TRO's being issued to slow down the imposition of lockdowns, placebo mask mandates and clot shot mandate violations of my civil and constitutional rights. Funny how illegal immigrants and malign foreign actors have more civil and constitutional rights than I, an American citizen have. Aren't all Emergency Order issued by executive powers the same, emergencies declared that don't allow for the normal and ordinary processes of authority and review the same? Seems not.

F 'em. And F the corrupt, anti-constitutional judges who were nowhere to be found when I lost my rights, my business, my home overnight in 2020. In a just world nobody would be above the law. Not even judges who arbitrarily, whimsically and capriciously apply the law to cases in a manner that only one side of the ideological divide benefits from.

Expand full comment
Tom Bouklas's avatar

“ The headlines say a judge has blocked action against Imran Ahmed; what they do not explain is why the government acted in the first place.”

What the headlines do not explain is which government and which courts. Once we understand that what we call “the government” is not our government, but a government controlled by a foreign entity, Britain, it all makes sense. The word Federal, as in Federal Court, means contractual (Webster’s online dictionary, 1828). All these entities like the courts etc. were intended to serve the people and were created by the people with clearly defined responsibilities. Their responsibility is to protect the Confederation of States through the establishment of laws which all states debated and eventually defined.

Imran Ahmed has engaged in the practice of censorship which is in direct violation of the freedoms which we have agreed are not merely permissible but the DIVINE RIGHT of each sovereign person in this nation.

My first inclination is to politely request the “Federal Judge” to pull his head out of his ass and rule according to the rights established almost 250 years ago. After about 10 seconds of thought I realized he is actually just doing the job he for which he was hired: follow the mandate given by the British corporation impersonating true government of this nation. As a ‘Federal Judge’ it is his contractual responsibility to obey their mandates. The same goes for the majority of Congress… they bow to their masters.

As for Imran, his head is so far up the ass of the Pharmaceutical companies (as well as other powerful entities) he will never find a way out. It appears that the day of doom is approaching for all these vermin, and little Imran had better find a very secure, fortified place of residence when the entire world turns against him and his paymasters. My suggestion is Patagonia.

Expand full comment
RJ's avatar

Dear America. Please keep him in a SuperMax for a few years until time can be found for a fair trial, oops hearing to be held

Expand full comment
ICE-9's avatar

The broadest question of all here is why do we need immigrants in a de-industrializing western civilization? We are always told that, "Immigrants built our nation." The answer is just a non sequitur. So if the west isn't building anything anymore, why do we need any immigrants? They are just brought in to game "democracy" and put the west one step closer to the End of History. And the more diverse they are, the faster that End of History arrives.

Expand full comment
AJ's avatar

My guess is Ahmed will be one of Jon Stewart's first podcast guests in 2026.

Expand full comment
Susie Heidner's avatar

He is a slippery little beast. He needs to be kicked out of our country ASAP.

Expand full comment
Dicky Mint's avatar

His history speaks volumes !

GUILTY ?

Expand full comment
Neural Foundry's avatar

Really sharp analysis here. The symmetry problem is what makes this so compelling: someone who spent years ensuring thatconstitutional protections didn't apply to others is now wielding those same protections as a shield. I've seen similar dynamics play out in tech policy circles where operatives from other countries pushed for aggressive moderation frameworks, then got surprised when similar tactics got used back at them. The State Department's framing around serious adverse foreign-policy consequences probably ends up being the linchpin here, since courts typically give executive broad deference in that domain.

Expand full comment