15 Comments
User's avatar
StellaMaris's avatar

LOVE this....ribbon bully... enjoy! https://substack.com/@stellamaris2/note/c-161637580

Sayer Ji's avatar

Thank you for that. I updated the article to incorporate it.

Shelly's avatar

If the populace would take a look at the financials, no one would donate to this organization. They are not ending cancers. They propagate them.

Skupe's avatar

It's not only breast cancer but ALL the disease societies are paid for in part by HARM. MS has been cured (not all cases) but often the earliest detected ones by Abram Hoffer. One issue with MS is that it's hard to detect. So go to an educated detector and not an allopath oncologist. Parkinsons's Disease and often ALZ can often be cured by eating healthier -- listen to carnivore talks on youtube.com to hear them! Many people who had taken the C19 shot and ended up with PD went on a carnivore diet or even an animal-based carnivore plan, with the addition of fruit, raw dairy and raw, organic honey. Many of these people had great success with it! The same goes for cancer! It has already been cured for a lot of people! Women, instead of mammograms (which are known for causing cancer) go for a yearly thermography. It doesn't hurt, with no pressure and is finished in less than 30 minutes. Even better, is that if they do find something, you will have at least a dozen years to heal before the mammogram would have shown anything! For me, it's worth spending the $200/year to get the test!

STH's avatar

Years of thermograms never found my cancer. It doesn’t work well with lobular carcinoma. Qtimaging.com is 50 times the resolution of an MRI.

Skupe's avatar

Still, most of the time it is better than a mammogram!

Barbara Charis's avatar

Fine article! Sickening the commercialism attached to the Pinkwashing connection to breast cancer. Years ago, i heard Dr. Lorraine day speak at health conventions...and bought her videos: Cancer doesn't Scare me Anymore and Diseases don't Just Happen. She had serious breast cancer and healed herself by going to a plant-based diet. In 1976, I had a rapidly growing tumor in the wall of my vagina...and two doctors told me that they would not 'give me any guarantees; unless I had it removed ASAP. I opted for prayer...and was guided to stop eating a specific food...and only eat raw fruit and vegetables. In less than 3 months the tumor disappeared. Twelve years later (1988), I developed another tumor, right above my right breast. It was a bulbous growth with spikes coming out of it. I didn't bother going to s doctor, I examined my food and found the culprit; stopped using it, and continued to eat raw fruit and vegetables...and in less than 3 months this tumor disappeared. I learned, if you don't feed a tumor it won't grow; nothing grows without a fuel.

STH's avatar

Hopefully QTImaging.com will expand to more areas beyond the three it is currently in. 50 times the resolution of an MRI and no radiation or compression!

Freedom Fox's avatar

I'm old enough to remember when Komen was revealed to be a major donor to countless other 'charities,' many unrelated to breast 'cancer.' Including their funding abortion factory and fetal tissue vendor Planned Parenthood. That momentarily caused an outcry from donors.

Komen raises so much money each year it can't possibly fund more research. And as Sayer points out, they know the cause and their conflict. So they have to shovel money out into something considered charitable or they'll lose their nonprofit status.

Truth of the breast cancer industry, the pinkwashing is the fundraising success they've had is purely a function of sex sells. Like it or not our society, men specifically love boobs. And what's better than putting money towards cleavage? In a respectable way, not just at a strip club.

I know, I know, adults in the room having a mature conversation about mammory glans in a medical, sterile way has nothing to do with sexualization of them. But every adult in the room knows that's the truth of the fundraising success. Colon cancer could never match the appeal.

Yes, brilliant marketing to pinkwaah. And all that money for boobies gets passed through to other charities that have nothing to do with breast cancer research, and more often than not goes to progressive aligned charities in the loosest definition of the word. Wouldn't doubt it if Komen donated to Marxist BLM. So it's pinkwashing + redwashing. 'Cause guys are suckers for boobs.

Ned B.'s avatar

The Susan G. Komen "Race for the cure" might more accurately be named: "The race to procure."

The Watchman's avatar

Good article, Sayer. Linking today as usual @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/

FourWinds's avatar

I roll my eyes every October when this crap comes out. NFL players wearing pink socks is nauseating and hilarious at the same time, although obviously have not seen that yet this year since I have not seen an October game yet. I’m not making fun of anyone with cancer, ever, but turning everything pink does nothing to find a “cure”. What gets me is no one gives half a damn to look for the cause. If you find that, I suspect you won’t need a cure.

Johnny Savvy's avatar

Braziers causing (adverse) restricted blood flow have been put in the spotlight too. I always asked, what about a cure? Didn't look to see how deep the rot really is! Nice work, Sir!!

Emily Kellogg's avatar

As a breast cancer thriver it’s always good to see more articles and things posted on this. So many consumers have no idea

ASK's avatar

Excellent article!!! Ever since a BC diagnosis, it has become clear what a total scam (ALL) medical charity really is. Especially the Pink Scam.

As well as how toxic all mainstream medical treatments (like chemo and drugs) are to the body, as well as draining to your bank account, right into their profits. Try saying no and walking away (they get nasty when you don’t agree to participate…)

Tamoxifen study… this was not something the doctors will tell you. Not profitable.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090825150954.htm

“Comparing breast-cancer patients who received the estrogen-blocking drug tamoxifen to those who did not, the researchers found that while the drug was associated with a 60 percent reduction in estrogen receptor-positive, or ER positive, second breast cancer – the more common type, which is responsive to estrogen-blocking therapy – it also appeared to increase the risk of ER negative second cancer by 440 percent.”