The Ancient Bacterium That Eats Roundup

A ubiquitous microorganism found in healthy soil and traditional foods the world over may be the missing link in restoring planetary and human health from the ground up.

One ancient and extremely powerful bacterium — in our soil, our fermented foods, and our own gut — is dismantling glyphosate, protecting our cardiovascular system, modulating our immunity, and reminding us that “germs” have always been the medicine

There is a quiet, almost poetic symmetry in the way Nature responds to human folly.

We have saturated our soils with a synthetic molecule designed to dismantle the shikimate pathway — the very pathway that bacteria in our guts depend on to make the amino acids that become our neurotransmitters, our connective tissue, our immune signals. We were told this molecule was safe for us because humans don’t possess the shikimate pathway. What we were not told, for decades, is that we are not only human. The 99% of our holobiont selves that is microbial in origin does possess the shikimate pathway. Glyphosate, by mechanism, is an antibiotic against the very organisms that make us who we are.

And yet, hidden within the same biosphere we have so casually poisoned, there exists a single, humble bacterium that can take this molecule apart — bond by bond — while at the same time producing some of the most therapeutically powerful biomolecules known to medicine. It lives in the soil beneath our feet. It lives in the fermented foods of every traditional cuisine that survived industrialization. It lives in the rhizospheres of our food crops. And — as researchers have come to recognize only in the past two decades — it lives in our own gastrointestinal tracts, where it has been working as a quiet commensal partner for as long as our species has existed.

Its name is Bacillus subtilis.

This is the story of how one ancestral microbe braids together nearly every thread of the microbiome revolution: the extensibility of our biology through microbial partners, the continuity between soil and gut that makes us inseparable from the living Earth, the restorative intelligence of microbial life that can heal damage our own genome cannot even register, and the ancestral dietary inheritance through which our forebears continuously renewed this relationship long before any of us had the language to name it.

Before we go further into the science, a single image to anchor what we mean when we say “we.” Da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man — the Renaissance icon of human perfection as a self-contained, geometrically complete being — has been reimagined in contemporary microbiome science as the Holobiont: a body inseparable from the trillions of microbes, fungi, viruses, and food-derived signaling molecules with which it lives in constant biochemical conversation.

The small colored spheres are vesicles (exosomes, outer membrane vesicles, food-borne microRNAs) carrying inter-kingdom information across what we once thought were sealed biological boundaries. Originally published in Trends in Microbiology (artistic composition by Laura Galeazzo). I explored the deeper implications in Leonardo da Vinci and the New Biology. For the present article, it is enough to note: this is the body that Bacillus subtilis partners with — and the body glyphosate is unknowingly attacking.

The Damage Glyphosate Does to the Holobiont

To understand why the B. subtilis story matters, we must first sit with the scale of what glyphosate has done.

Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Roundup and is the most widely applied herbicide in agricultural history. It is sprayed onto Roundup-Ready GM crops, used as a pre-harvest desiccant on conventional wheat and oats, and applied to fields, lawns, parks, and roadsides on every inhabited continent. Its industrial defenders have repeated, for nearly half a century, that glyphosate is safe for mammals because mammals do not possess the shikimate pathway — the metabolic route through which plants, fungi, and bacteria synthesize the aromatic amino acids phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan.

The argument is technically true and biologically dishonest. We do not possess the shikimate pathway. Our microbiome does. The bacteria of our gut — including the Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species that ferment our foods, modulate our immunity, produce our B-vitamins, and govern the gut-brain axis — depend on the shikimate pathway.¹ ² So do many fungi in our mycobiome. So do many soil organisms that build the living substrate beneath every meal we have ever eaten.

What the published research has now made unambiguously clear — across in vitro studies, animal models, and metabolomic analyses — is that glyphosate exposure selectively suppresses many of the beneficial members of the gut community while leaving certain pathogens relatively unscathed. Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium have been shown to be more susceptible to glyphosate than Clostridium perfringens and certain Salmonella strains.³ The shikimate pathway has been documented as transcriptionally active across a meaningful fraction of human gut microbes,⁴ and metabolomic studies in rats have confirmed accumulation of shikimate-pathway intermediates — the biochemical fingerprint of glyphosate inhibition — inside living animals exposed to environmentally relevant doses.⁵ Samsel and Seneff first articulated the broader implications of this mechanism for chronic human disease in their 2013 Entropy review on glyphosate’s suppression of cytochrome P450 enzymes and microbial amino acid biosynthesis.¹

This is the meaning of glyphosate’s harm: it is not a “human toxin” in the narrow toxicological sense. It is a holobiont toxin. It targets the inner ecology that constitutes 99% of our genetic identity. Because the body it was poisoning was never recognized as a body by the regulatory science that approved it, the damage was allowed to accumulate, generation upon generation, until it now shows up in the epidemic curves of celiac disease, IBD, autism, depression, autoimmunity, and the metabolic disorders that increasingly define the modern human condition.

When we ask what glyphosate “does” to a person, the honest answer is: it does not act on the person at all. It acts on the microbial communities through which the person exists.

Bacillus subtilis: The Bacterium We Forgot We Knew

And yet, in the very soil that conventional agriculture has carpet-bombed, an older lineage of bacteria carries on its ancient work. Among them is Bacillus subtilis.

B. subtilis is one of the most studied organisms in all of biology. It is the textbook gram-positive bacterium, the model organism for sporulation, the workhorse of fermentation laboratories around the world. For most of the twentieth century, microbiologists classified it as a soil bacterium — a tidy designation that allowed us to think of it as separate from us, “out there” in the dirt. That classification has been quietly overturned.

In 2009, researchers at Royal Holloway University in London, working with strains isolated directly from ileum biopsies and fecal samples of healthy humans, demonstrated that B. subtilis had adapted to life inside the human gastrointestinal tract.⁶ The bacterium could sporulate anaerobically, secrete antimicrobials against pathogens, and form protective biofilms along the gut wall. Their conclusion was unambiguous: B. subtilis and other spore-formers should be considered “gut commensals rather than solely soil microorganisms.”⁶ Subsequent reviews have confirmed and extended this view, noting that B. subtilis spores survive cooking temperatures, the acidity of the stomach, and the bile of the small intestine — and that they germinate, grow, and contribute metabolically once they reach the gut.⁷

This is itself a small microbiome revolution. B. subtilis is not “out there” — it is, and has always been, part of us. Our ancestors, foraging unwashed roots and tubers, eating naturally fermented foods, drinking unfiltered spring water, breathing air thick with soil dust during planting and harvest, were continuously inoculated with this organism. It travelled with us, in us, alongside us, across continents and millennia. The boundary between the soil’s microbiome and ours, between the field and the gut, was never the hard line modern hygiene imagined it to be. It was, as the herbalist Paul Schulick named it, a life bridge — and B. subtilis is one of the species that walks it.

How Our Ancestors Met This Bacterium Every Day

Long before “probiotic” became a marketing word, B. subtilis was already a daily dietary inheritance for human beings across the planet. It lived in the foods our ancestors knew were sacred — foods so often associated with longevity and vitality that traditional cultures built entire ritual practices around their preparation.

The most celebrated dietary source is natto, the traditional Japanese fermented soybean dish in which Bacillus subtilisvar. natto converts cooked soybeans into one of the most nutrient-dense, bioactive foods in the human dietary record.⁸ Eaten daily for centuries in regions of Japan associated with exceptional cardiovascular health and bone density,⁹ natto is a living culture — every spoonful contains billions of active B. subtilis organisms along with the cascade of bioactive molecules they produce.

But natto is only the most famous example. B. subtilis and its close relatives are involved in fermentation of:

• Kinema, thua nao, and pe-poke — the soybean ferments of Nepal, Thailand, and Myanmar, dietary parallels to natto with their own indigenous Bacillus strains

• Dawadawa, iru, and ogiri — West African condiments fermented from locust bean, soybean, or melon seed, central to the cuisines of Nigeria, Ghana, Senegal, and surrounding regions

• Cheonggukjang — the rapidly-fermented Korean soybean paste, traditionally aged on rice straw rich in wild Bacillus

• Doenjang and chunjang — slower Korean fermented bean pastes carrying Bacillus alongside the more famous Aspergillus and Lactobacillus communities

• Raw, unwashed root vegetables — carrots, beets, parsnips, and tubers pulled from healthy living soil carry B. subtilis spores on their surface, which is one reason traditional cuisines historically did not over-sterilize their produce, and why ‘eating dirt’ (albeit healthy sources in very small quantities) may be an essential part of health.

• Wild and properly-tended honey — honey collected from hives surrounded by biodiverse pasture and forest harbors Bacillus species among its broader microbial signature [learn more about the microbial wonders of raw honey here]

• Aged hay, grass-finished animal products, and raw milk from animals on pasture — B. subtilis was historically named hay bacillus because it was first cultivated from hay; pastured-animal foods naturally carry this organism

What this means, in plain biological terms, is that B. subtilis exposure was continuous for our ancestors. Not a once-a-week event. A daily, almost hourly inoculation through food, water, air, and soil contact. The modern lifestyle — sterile kitchens, washed produce, pasteurized everything, sealed packaged foods, dirt-free hands — has functionally eliminated this exposure for most people living in industrialized societies. We have, in effect, severed one of the oldest continuous microbial relationships in the human evolutionary record.

What This Bacterium Actually Does for Us

The reason B. subtilis mattered so deeply to our ancestors is not romantic. It is biochemical. This single organism is one of the most prolific producers of therapeutically active molecules in the entire microbial world. The peer-reviewed literature on its secondary metabolites now spans thousands of papers. A short list of what B. subtilis makes, while alive in our food or in our gut, includes:

Nattokinase. Produced during the fermentation of soy, nattokinase is a serine protease with potent fibrinolytic activity — it dissolves fibrin, the protein scaffold that holds blood clots together.¹⁰ It is one of the most extensively studied natural cardiovascular compounds in the literature, with documented effects on blood viscosity, atherosclerotic plaque, blood pressure, and circulatory function.¹⁰ ¹¹ Daily natto consumption has been associated, in Japanese population studies, with lower cardiovascular mortality and reduced stroke risk.⁹

Vitamin K2 as menaquinone-7 (MK-7). B. subtilis var. natto is, by a wide margin, the richest known biological source of MK-7 — the long-chain form of vitamin K2 with the longest half-life in human serum.⁸ ¹² MK-7 activates osteocalcin (which directs calcium into bone) and matrix Gla protein (which keeps calcium out of arterial walls). The clinical implications are significant: MK-7 supplementation has been associated with reduced arterial calcification, improved bone density in postmenopausal women, and lower cardiovascular mortality.¹² A 100-gram serving of natto contains roughly 1 milligram of MK-7, an amount essentially impossible to obtain from any other food.¹²

Surfactin. A cyclic lipopeptide and one of the most powerful biosurfactants known. Recent research has documented surfactin’s ability to enhance secretory IgA production, increase intestinal villus height, upregulate tight-junction proteins (claudin-1, occludin, ZO-1) that maintain gut barrier integrity, and reduce intestinal inflammation in models of induced colitis.¹³ Surfactin also has documented antiviral activity, including against enveloped viruses, and has been shown to inhibit the VEGF pathway involved in tumor angiogenesis — making it an emerging candidate in oncology research.¹⁴

Subtilisin and related proteases. Powerful protein-digesting enzymes that contribute to the breakdown of dietary proteins (including the difficult-to-digest gluten proteins of wheat) and to the catabolism of damaged proteins in tissues. B. subtilis proteases are part of the reason traditional fermented soy foods are more digestible than unfermented soy.

Bacteriocins and antimicrobial peptides. A broad arsenal of compounds — subtilin, mycosubtilin, fengycin, iturin, plipastatin — with documented activity against pathogenic bacteria (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), pathogenic fungi (including Candida albicans), and certain viruses.¹⁴ These compounds are part of how B. subtilis in our gut helps maintain the microbial balance that resists opportunistic infections.

Folate, riboflavin, biotin, and other B-vitamins. Like many beneficial gut commensals, B. subtilis contributes directly to the synthesis of essential cofactors our own cells cannot produce.⁷

Immune-modulating spore-coat proteins. Even before germination, B. subtilis spores interact with gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), training the immune system, biasing it toward tolerance rather than reactivity, and contributing to the gut-immune axis that determines so much of our overall health.⁷

This is the supra-human principle in plain biochemistry. We could not, with our human genome alone, make these molecules. We borrow them — daily, ancestrally, through diet and exposure — from a microbial partner whose chemical capabilities vastly exceed our own.

The Clinical Picture: What Happens When We Restore the Relationship

The literature on B. subtilis as a probiotic supplement has matured considerably in recent years, and the clinical signal is consistent. A recent open-label pilot trial conducted by the Center for Applied Health Sciences using Bacillus subtilisAB22™ at 1 billion CFU per day for six weeks documented, in healthy adult volunteers, statistically significant improvements in:¹⁵

• Bloating (baseline scores nearly halving, from 4.0 to 2.0)

• Flatulence (4.3 to 2.6)

• Abdominal discomfort (trending improvement)

• Enthusiasm and well-being (significant increases)

• Fatigue, anxiety, and nervousness (significant decreases)

• TNF-α — a central pro-inflammatory cytokine implicated in systemic inflammation, fatigue, mood disturbance, and chronic disease — showed a statistically significant decrease in serum levels¹⁵

The TNF-α reduction is, biologically, the most important data point. It provides a measurable mechanistic anchor for the mood, energy, and gut comfort improvements: when systemic inflammation decreases, the entire neuroendocrine-immune axis recalibrates. The gut-brain axis is no longer a metaphor; it is a measurable cascade of cytokines, neuroactive metabolites, and vagal signaling that B. subtilis demonstrably modulates.¹³ ¹⁵

This is the AB22™ form of Bacillus subtilis that I selected for CardioNK™, my own cardiovascular-regenerative formulation.¹⁶ CardioNK was built around what I call the Regenerative Natto Complex: a single ancient ferment delivering nattokinase (2 billion colony-forming units (CFU) and 10,800 fibrinolytic units per dose, anchored to the dose range used in the clinical literature), AB22® Bacillus subtilis itself, and MK-7 — all three of which originate from the same organism, working in the same biological synergy our ancestors received every time they ate a bowl of natto. Layered on top are EA-613™ hyper-soluble ellagic acid and pterostilbene for additional polyphenolic vascular and metabolic support.¹⁶ The design philosophy was simple: instead of fragmenting the natto ferment into isolated, decontextualized molecules, deliver them the way Nature delivered them — together, in their evolved synergy, with the parent organism still present.

Bs-15 Discovery: A Microbial Answer to a Synthetic Problem

And now we return to the soil — and to the deepest expression of B. subtilis‘s capacity to heal what industrial chemistry has broken.

In 2015, a research team from the Shandong Institute of Pomology, working with Rutgers University and the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, published a study in Genetics and Molecular Research with the unassuming title ”Glyphosate biodegradation and potential soil bioremediation by Bacillus subtilis strain Bs-15.”¹⁷

The Bs-15 strain had been isolated from the rhizosphere — the thin, living layer of soil clinging to plant roots — of a pepper plant. Earlier work had shown that this strain promoted plant growth and suppressed disease. What Yu and colleagues set out to test was whether Bs-15 could do something even more remarkable: take a synthetic, organophosphorus molecule that resists chemical, hydrolytic, and photolytic breakdown — and dismantle it.

The results were striking.

Bs-15 not only survived glyphosate exposure; it thrived in it. The bacterium tolerated glyphosate concentrations up to 40,000 mg/L — a concentration vastly higher than anything an ecosystem would ever encounter.¹⁷ It could use glyphosate as both a carbon and a phosphorus source, meaning the molecule that the industry treats as a permanent contaminant was, for Bs-15, a meal. Under optimized conditions, Bs-15 degraded approximately 65% of glyphosate in liquid culture within 60 hours. In non-sterile soil, where Bs-15 worked in concert with the native microbial community, degradation reached 71.57% within four days.¹⁷

Even more telling was what happened to the overall microbial ecosystem when Bs-15 was introduced. Using BIOLOG ECO microplate analysis — a standard ecological method for measuring functional diversity in microbial communities — the researchers found that glyphosate-contaminated soils inoculated with Bs-15 showed significantly greater functional diversity across five separate indices (Shannon, Shannon uniformity, Simpson, McIntosh, and McIntosh uniformity) than uninoculated controls.¹⁷ The bacterium was not only degrading the herbicide; it was restoring the biological complexity the herbicide had collapsed.

In other words: Bs-15 was healing the soil.

Subsequent research has extended this story. Engineered glyphosate oxidase enzymes derived from Bacillus species have demonstrated catalytic efficiency toward glyphosate increased by more than a thousand-fold, with selectivity for glyphosate over related molecules.¹⁸ A 2023 study published in Environmental Microbiology further documented that B. subtilis naturally adapts to glyphosate exposure not primarily through mutation but through reducing uptake of the herbicide — a remarkably elegant survival strategy that preserves the integrity of its own shikimate pathway.¹⁹ The bacterium, in other words, recognizes glyphosate as a threat and protects itself.

The Threads, Braided

This is where the deeper pattern emerges, and where the microbiome lens earns its keep.

First — extensibility. The human genome cannot break down glyphosate. Our liver enzymes do not metabolize it cleanly; what little processing occurs is largely passive, and the bulk of the molecule is excreted in a form structurally similar to what entered. Likewise, our genome cannot produce nattokinase, MK-7, surfactin, or the antimicrobial peptides that protect us from opportunistic pathogens. None of this is part of “our” 1% of the holobiont. Yet B. subtilis — an organism that lives both in soil and in our own intestines, and that we have eaten ancestrally for millennia — can do all of it. This is the supra-human principle in action. We extend our biological capability through our microbial partners. What we cannot metabolize, they metabolize for us. What we cannot synthesize, they synthesize for us. What we cannot defend ourselves against, they defend us against. The holobiont is the unit of physiology — not the human body in isolation.

Second — continuity. The same species that lives in pepper-plant rhizospheres also lives in fermented soybeans, in raw honey, in hay, in pasture-finished dairy, and in the human gut. It travels between soil and body, between field and digestive tract, through every traditional food culture our species ever developed. There is no clean separation. When industrial agriculture poisons the soil microbiome, it is poisoning a continuous biological tissue that includes our own. When we sterilize, pasteurize, and chemically wash our food into lifelessness, we are severing the same continuity. Conversely, when we eat natto, when we honor fermented traditions, when we restore the soil’s microbiome through wild-soil inoculation and regenerative farming — we are restoring an organ of our own extended physiology.

Third — restorative intelligence. The Bs-15 study is not a story of a single bacterium overpowering a single toxin. It is a story of a community coming back to life. The most important finding in the paper is not the degradation percentage — it is the functional diversity indices. Bs-15’s presence allowed dozens of other microbial species, suppressed by glyphosate, to recover. The bacterium acted as a keystone, a starting point from which a whole ecology re-assembled itself. This is the signature of biological intelligence at the ecosystem scale: not the linear “kill the bad thing” logic of biocide chemistry, but the recursive, generative logic of life restoring life through relationship.

Fourth — ancestral inheritance. Every culture that survived industrialization with their cardiovascular, skeletal, and digestive health intact had B. subtilis in their daily food. Not as a supplement. As a tradition. The Japanese have natto. The Koreans have cheonggukjang. The Nepalese have kinema. The West Africans have dawadawa. The Europeans had hay-fermented dairy, traditionally aged cheeses, root cellars where vegetables remained in contact with their soil microbiome. This was not nutritional coincidence. It was, across the entire human species, the dietary expression of a multi-million-year coevolutionary partnership.

What This Means

The implications, set in the context of two decades of microbiome research, are quietly enormous.

It means that the most widely applied herbicide on Earth — a molecule that regulatory science declared “safe” because it didn’t directly poison the eukaryotic human cell — is, by mechanism, an antibiotic against the holobiont. The harm has always been there. We simply lacked the conceptual framework to see it.

It means that our gut, our soil, and our food are not separate domains but continuous biological tissue, and that what we do to one of them we do to all of them. The “life bridge” between the inside and outside of the body has never been metaphor. It is a measurable, molecularly mediated continuity carried by organisms like B. subtilis.

It means that the cardiovascular, immune, mood, and gut benefits documented in the clinical literature on natto, nattokinase, and MK-7 are not isolated nutraceutical effects. They are the recovery of a relationship — the restoration of biological information our ancestors received every day, and that most modern humans have lost.

And it means — perhaps most importantly — that Nature has not abandoned us. Even after decades of poisoning, the bacteria that can heal the damage are still there. Still in the soil. Still in the rhizospheres of plants. Still in the fermented foods of every traditional cuisine that has survived. Still in our own guts, waiting for us to stop eradicating them. They are waiting. They are willing. They are, by their very metabolism, for life.

The work of restoration, then, is not heroic and it is not technological. It is humble and ecological. Stop the spraying. Restore the soil. Eat the ferments — natto, dawadawa, kinema, real raw honey, real raw foods from real living soil. Take the spore-form probiotics, particularly clinically validated strains like AB22™, when ferment access is limited. Honor the diversity. Recognize, finally, that the body we are trying to heal does not end at our skin and that the medicine has always been in relationship — with the microbes, with the soil, with each other, and with the living Earth from which we have never truly been separate.

Bacillus subtilis knew this all along.

It was waiting for us to catch up.

If you want to learn more about natto and nattokinase, watch my video on the topic here.

---

References

1. Samsel, A., & Seneff, S. (2013). Glyphosate’s suppression of cytochrome P450 enzymes and amino acid biosynthesis by the gut microbiome: Pathways to modern diseases. Entropy, 15(4), 1416–1463.

2. Mesnage, R., & Antoniou, M. N. (2020). Computational modelling shows that indigenous gut microorganisms metabolise the herbicide glyphosate. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/870105

3. Shehata, A. A., Schrödl, W., Aldin, A. A., Hafez, H. M., & Krüger, M. (2013). The effect of glyphosate on potential pathogens and beneficial members of poultry microbiota in vitro. Current Microbiology, 66(4), 350–358.

4. Puigbò, P., Leino, L. I., Rainio, M. J., Saikkonen, K., Saloniemi, I., & Helander, M. (2022). Does glyphosate affect the human microbiota? Life, 12(5), 707. (Computational analysis of shikimate pathway prevalence in gut microbiome.)

5. Mesnage, R., Teixeira, M., Mandrioli, D., Falcioni, L., Ducarmon, Q. R., Zwittink, R. D., Mazzacuva, F., Caldwell, A., Halket, J., Amiel, C., Panoff, J. M., Belpoggi, F., & Antoniou, M. N. (2021). Use of shotgun metagenomics and metabolomics to evaluate the impact of glyphosate or Roundup MON 52276 on the gut microbiota and serum metabolome of Sprague-Dawley rats. Environmental Health Perspectives, 129(1), 017005.

6. Hong, H. A., Khaneja, R., Tam, N. M. K., Cazzato, A., Tan, S., Urdaci, M., Brisson, A., Gasbarrini, A., Barnes, I., & Cutting, S. M. (2009). Bacillus subtilis isolated from the human gastrointestinal tract. Research in Microbiology, 160(2), 134–143.

7. Lefevre, M., Racedo, S. M., Ripert, G., Housez, B., Cazaubiel, M., Maudet, C., Jüsten, P., Marteau, P., & Urdaci, M. C. (2024). Spore-based probiotic Bacillus subtilis: Current applications in humans and future perspectives. Fermentation, 10(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10020078

8. Sumi, H., Hamada, H., Tsushima, H., Mihara, H., & Muraki, H. (1987). A novel fibrinolytic enzyme (nattokinase) in the vegetable cheese natto; a typical and popular soybean food in the Japanese diet. Experientia, 43(10), 1110–1111.

9. Nagata, C., Wada, K., Tamura, T., Konishi, K., Goto, Y., Koda, S., Kawachi, T., Tsuji, M., & Nakamura, K. (2017). Dietary soy and natto intake and cardiovascular disease mortality in Japanese adults: The Takayama study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 105(2), 426–431.

10. Chen, H., McGowan, E. M., Ren, N., Lal, S., Nassif, N., Shad-Kaneez, F., Qu, X., & Lin, Y. (2018). Nattokinase: A promising alternative in prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Biomarker Insights, 13, 1177271918785130.

11. Kurosawa, Y., Nirengi, S., Homma, T., Esaki, K., Ohta, M., Clark, J. F., & Hamaoka, T. (2015). A single-dose of oral nattokinase potentiates thrombolysis and anti-coagulation profiles. Scientific Reports, 5, 11601.

12. Sato, T., Inaba, N., & Yamashita, T. (2020). MK-7 and its effects on bone quality and strength. Nutrients, 12(4), 965; and Schurgers, L. J., Teunissen, K. J. F., Hamulyák, K., Knapen, M. H. J., Vik, H., & Vermeer, C. (2007). Vitamin K-containing dietary supplements: Comparison of synthetic vitamin K1 and natto-derived menaquinone-7. Blood, 109(8), 3279–3283.

13. Wu, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, L., Ye, W., Liu, Y., Sun, J., Wang, X., & Wang, W. (2024). Surfactin from Bacillus subtilisenhances immune response and contributes to the maintenance of intestinal microbial homeostasis. Microbiology Spectrum, 12(12), e00918-24.

14. Caulier, S., Nannan, C., Gillis, A., Licciardi, F., Bragard, C., & Mahillon, J. (2019). Overview of the antimicrobial compounds produced by members of the Bacillus subtilis group. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 302; and Wu, Y. S., Ngai, S. C., Goh, B. H., Chan, K. G., Lee, L. H., & Chuah, L. H. (2017). Anticancer activities of surfactin and potential application of nanotechnology assisted surfactin delivery. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 8, 761.

15. Center for Applied Health Sciences (CAHS). (2024). The Efficacy and Tolerability of Bacillus subtilis AB22™: A Pilot Clinical Study on Gut Health, Mood, and Immunomodulation. Open-label proof-of-concept pilot trial, 1×10⁹ CFU daily, 42 days, n=10 healthy adult volunteers. Primary endpoints: adverse events, VAS gastrointestinal/mood/stress measures, serum cytokine panel including TNF-α. Amplified Ingredients, LLC.

16. Regenerate Company. CardioNK™ Product Documentation: Regenerative Natto Complex (nattokinase 10,800 FU, AB22® Bacillus subtilis, vitamin K2 MK-7), EA-613™ hyper-soluble ellagic acid, and pterostilbene. https://regeneratecompany.com/products/cardionk

17. Yu, X. M., Yu, T., Yin, G. H., Dong, Q. L., An, M., Wang, H. R., & Ai, C. X. (2015). Glyphosate biodegradation and potential soil bioremediation by Bacillus subtilis strain Bs-15. Genetics and Molecular Research, 14(4), 14717–14730. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.November.18.37

18. Qin, Y., Wu, G., Guo, Y., Ke, D., Yin, J., Wang, D., Fan, X., Liu, Z., Ruan, L., & Hu, Y. (2020). Engineered glyphosate oxidase coupled to spore-based chemiluminescence system for glyphosate detection. Analytica Chimica Acta, 1133, 39–47; and Delprat, N., Martins, L. O., Blum, L. J., Aymard, C. M. G., Leca-Bouvier, B., Octobre, G., & Doumèche, B. (2023). User-friendly one-step disposable signal-on bioassay for glyphosate detection in water samples. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 241, 115689.

19. Schwedt, I., Schöne, K., Eckert, M., Pizzinato, M., Winkler, L., Knotkova, B., Richts, B., Hau, J. L., Steuber, J., Mireles, R., Noda-Garcia, L., Fritz, G., Mittelstädt, C., Hertel, R., & Commichau, F. M. (2023). The low mutational flexibility of the EPSP synthase in Bacillus subtilis is due to a higher demand for shikimate pathway intermediates. Environmental Microbiology, 25(12), 3604–3622.