I think a much deeper probe into "the other side of Obama's brain," Valerie Jarrett needs to be made to find much more truth that goes back a long, long time. She had been on the Board of Trustees of Chicago Medical Center for thirteen years before Obama brought her into his administration as Senior Advisor.
Valerie Jarrett's father, Dr. James Bowman, was a pathologist and geneticist.
And had been a leader in a Marxist Medical Sociology organization known as AIMS. Which was disbanded and scattered to other medical sociology movements after it was associated with the Red Scare (Red Fact) during the McCarthy Anti-Communist hearings:
And Public Health is the construct that "Medical Sociology" builds itself inside government, law, legislation, agencies, businesses, whole of society, especially when Public Health Emergencies are declared. What is Medical Sociology?:
"Medical sociology may be traced back to the late 1800s in terms of intellectual development. Sociology and allopathic medicine, two embryonic sciences, began to make contact in modest but major ways in the late 19th century."
A book that came into my view when I followed a link in this Council on Foreign Relations piece published in Foreign Affairs in March, 2020. Which told us the direction it all was intended to go:
The time frame you are describing for Epstein and Obama, Samantha Power's involvement, must have also involved Valerie Jarrett, as Obama's longest serving Advisor. And the other side of Obama's brain. Medical Sociology. Joined at the hip with allopathic medicine, public health since they were both embryos. To effect "fundamental change" as Obama promised, in the US and globally.
A part of the corrupt Chicago political machine from birth. Served in key roles in the Daley administrations. Serves not only as the head of the Obama Foundation, but also on several boards, including Goldman Sachs Foundation. Remember, Epstein and Goldman Sachs, his DAF fund he integrated plandemic profiteers and opportunists into was a Goldman Sachs product.
Her daughter, Laura Jarrett, is a media talking head, with NBC today, had been at CNN. It's all one big incestuous family.
I think so. Her mother was also a prize (sarc). When I was researching Valerie a few years ago she had similar disturbing connections. That integrate into this discussion. Mind sciences, psychoanalytics. Human psychology is at the core of sociology, the Medical Sociology merger.
Ebola does not exist, it is poor sanitation of water. If Bill Gates really wanted to help the people of Africa he would have built them clean water systems. Instead he sold them vaccine poisons.
SARS2-Cov19 had elements of the Axis of Evil biosynthetic toxic spike proteins from;
HIV-attacks immune system (Epstein spike protein).
Hemorrhagic Fever (Ebola), attacks heart and red blood cells, FauXi tried Remdesivir on humans for Ebola, stopped after 6 months when it has a 54% mortality rate, FauXi then Man Dated Remdesivir for Cov19 Horsepital Protocols in order to get CoViD Bonus Bucks, around $475,000 extra per Remdesivir to Fentanyl victim, as doctors made on average $250,000 extra for pushing Safe & Effective CoViD jabs. (Obama spike protein).
Absolutely amazing work! Surely there is nowhere for them to hide after this. But we'll see I guess. I'm still very curious about the media's involvement in all of this. Without the fear campaign raging across all forms of mainstream news, none of this would have happened.
To have something to screen someone for something as dangerous as ebola before they became symptomatic and before they entered the country is not a bad thing. It is absolutely a national security issue. You don't want ebola spreading across miliary bases much less the general population. It doesn't mean both things can't be true, that Epstein and his network were looking to profit from pandemic and preparedness was needed as it was a national security risk. As for the political control of the senate, she was right. It would have been bad for Dems if we had an ebola outbreak, just as COVID-19 was bad for Trump's re-election. Of course, the opposition is going to use something like that to their advantage. Every move Trump made during the pandemic was done through the lens on how it would impact his re-election. That has been well documented in books from former Trump staffers.
There is nothing "opaque" about donor advised funds ("DAF"). Easily legally created, the donor funds it with cash or assets, and can only disburse it to 501(c)3 organizations, i.e., charitable organizations.
Seems to me that it is the IRS code, 501(c)3, that is being abused.
This is a provocative thread, and I agree with the underlying instinct to scrutinize power + philanthropy + emergency governance; those ecosystems do create perverse incentives, and sunlight matters.
That said, as a physician-scientist I think it’s crucial not to let legitimate governance critique get fused into biologically implausible or weakly supported biomedical claims.
A few calibrations that would strengthen the argument (and protect readers from misinformation):
1. “Documentary fact” needs primary documents + clear inference steps. If the thesis is “this week ‘activated’ a biosecurity state,” then the post should show (a) the specific DOJ exhibits, (b) what they directly establish, and (c) what is interpretation. Otherwise, the narrative reads more like pattern-matching than proof. 
2. Ebola vaccines can’t ‘give you Ebola.’ WHO is explicit that Ebola vaccination cannot infect you with Ebola because licensed vaccines do not contain live Ebola virus. For ERVEBO, regulators state it contains a different virus vector plus one Ebola protein and cannot cause Ebola disease. 
3. If the piece is going to lean on “Ebola reframed under UN Chapter VII” or “military-grade threat,” it would be helpful to cite the actual UN resolution text and policy documents and keep the biology separate from the politics.
I’m all for auditing conflicts of interest and emergency-power creep. But the argument becomes much stronger (and more trustworthy) when it avoids biomedical “gotchas” and clearly distinguishes what the documents prove from what the author believes they imply.
Thank you for the thoughtful engagement — I genuinely appreciate the care behind it.
A few clarifications that I think matter:
1. The article does not claim that Ebola vaccines "give you Ebola." The piece doesn't discuss Ebola vaccination at all. It examines how Ebola was reclassified as a security threat under UNSC Resolution 2177, and how private networks — documented in newly released DOJ exhibits — were positioned around that governance shift. I'd welcome a re-read with that distinction in mind.
2. On primary documents: every claim in the article is sourced to specific DOJ exhibit numbers (linked and cited), and there is an explicit section — "What This Investigation Does—and Does Not—Claim" — that draws the line between what the documents establish and what they do not. The inference steps are there.
3. On the UN resolutions: the article references both UNSC Resolution 2177 and GA Resolution 69/1 by number, including the Chapter VII framing and the creation of UNMEER.
I share your instinct that governance critique should be rigorous and clearly sourced. That's exactly what this series aims to be. If you see specific claims in the text that you believe are unsupported by the cited documents, I'd be glad to discuss them.
We saw its filthy backsides during the fake Covid n poisonous jab shenanigans and we aren't playing those "stupid" misinformation ( a psyop word that came into our collective consciousness) games anymore.
Enough of it. Any sane human knows where Ebola came from. Go check the timeliness n history yourself but I doubt you'll do that exhaustive research. It all came down to injections given to the people to prevent something else. Thank God we've finally woken and are fully alive to the tricks of peadophilic gates and Epstein mixed with an unhealthy dose of global public health.
We will never bow or comply anymore.
We choose freedom.
We call for all pandemic operators, funders and enablers to be prosecuted.
I think a much deeper probe into "the other side of Obama's brain," Valerie Jarrett needs to be made to find much more truth that goes back a long, long time. She had been on the Board of Trustees of Chicago Medical Center for thirteen years before Obama brought her into his administration as Senior Advisor.
Valerie Jarrett's father, Dr. James Bowman, was a pathologist and geneticist.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/communism-in-jarretts-family/
And had been a leader in a Marxist Medical Sociology organization known as AIMS. Which was disbanded and scattered to other medical sociology movements after it was associated with the Red Scare (Red Fact) during the McCarthy Anti-Communist hearings:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_Internes_and_Medical_Students (AIMS)
Medical Sociology is also tied to Marxist "Conflict Theory":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_theories
And Public Health is the construct that "Medical Sociology" builds itself inside government, law, legislation, agencies, businesses, whole of society, especially when Public Health Emergencies are declared. What is Medical Sociology?:
https://www.sociologygroup.com/medical-sociology/
"Medical sociology may be traced back to the late 1800s in terms of intellectual development. Sociology and allopathic medicine, two embryonic sciences, began to make contact in modest but major ways in the late 19th century."
AIMS helped midwife Disease Politics:
https://academic.oup.com/jhmas/article/74/2/127/5481292
And the "Logic of Disease Politics" was used in China to fundamentally transform a nation of nationalists into collectivists, Communists:
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-39982-4
A book that came into my view when I followed a link in this Council on Foreign Relations piece published in Foreign Affairs in March, 2020. Which told us the direction it all was intended to go:
Past Pandemics Exposed China’s Weaknesses
The Current One Highlights Its Strengths
Foreign Affairs, March 27, 2020
https://web.archive.org/web/20200328050913/https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2020-03-27/past-pandemics-exposed-chinas-weaknesses
I pinned it all on my Stack that introduces "The Logic of Disease Politics" examining the publication from China that describes how it was done:
https://freedomfox.substack.com/p/the-devious-use-of-infectious-disease
The time frame you are describing for Epstein and Obama, Samantha Power's involvement, must have also involved Valerie Jarrett, as Obama's longest serving Advisor. And the other side of Obama's brain. Medical Sociology. Joined at the hip with allopathic medicine, public health since they were both embryos. To effect "fundamental change" as Obama promised, in the US and globally.
I've always thought she was obama's handler. Didn't she live in the white house with them?
Jarrett's Wiki (approved narrative source):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Jarrett
A part of the corrupt Chicago political machine from birth. Served in key roles in the Daley administrations. Serves not only as the head of the Obama Foundation, but also on several boards, including Goldman Sachs Foundation. Remember, Epstein and Goldman Sachs, his DAF fund he integrated plandemic profiteers and opportunists into was a Goldman Sachs product.
Her daughter, Laura Jarrett, is a media talking head, with NBC today, had been at CNN. It's all one big incestuous family.
I think so. Her mother was also a prize (sarc). When I was researching Valerie a few years ago she had similar disturbing connections. That integrate into this discussion. Mind sciences, psychoanalytics. Human psychology is at the core of sociology, the Medical Sociology merger.
This is the killer app of the Epstein files *kinda can't believe they actually released them.
This work is vital, Sayer. Thank you for peeling back the onion layers and bringing the receipts.
In my own way, I'm trying to call attention to this work, like it's a modern-day Pentagon Papers.
p.s. In case you have not yet heard (although I suspect you have), James Corbett brought up a searchable Epstein Files project called jmail[dot]world.
[ https://deepd1ve.substack.com/p/660-new-billionaires ]
Ebola does not exist, it is poor sanitation of water. If Bill Gates really wanted to help the people of Africa he would have built them clean water systems. Instead he sold them vaccine poisons.
When is his PERP walk FFS???
No one should be able to declare a (so-called) “emergency”. They’re all fake.
And, STILL NO ACCOUNTABILITY for these well-known criminals....‼️
#ExecuteEveryTraitor
SARS2-Cov19 had elements of the Axis of Evil biosynthetic toxic spike proteins from;
HIV-attacks immune system (Epstein spike protein).
Hemorrhagic Fever (Ebola), attacks heart and red blood cells, FauXi tried Remdesivir on humans for Ebola, stopped after 6 months when it has a 54% mortality rate, FauXi then Man Dated Remdesivir for Cov19 Horsepital Protocols in order to get CoViD Bonus Bucks, around $475,000 extra per Remdesivir to Fentanyl victim, as doctors made on average $250,000 extra for pushing Safe & Effective CoViD jabs. (Obama spike protein).
SARS, attacking respiratory system. (Bill Gates spike protein).
Yup just another couple of Epstein candidates
When we have judges that are not activists in place, I hope these perpetrators are held accountable to the full extent of the law.
► WHO "Murdered" People In Ebola Clinical Trails!! Dr Dave Martin EXPOSES WHO Like Never Before - SF #368 | Russel Brand, May 17, 2024: https://rumble.com/v4vr72z-oh-sht-who-murder-people-in-ebola-clinical-trails-who-exposed-like-never-be.html
► Did West Africa's Ebola Outbreak of 2014 Have a Lab Origin? | By Sam Husseini and Jonathan R Latham, PhD, Executive Director of the Bioscience Resource Project, October 25, 2022: https://www.independentsciencenews.org/health/did-west-africas-ebola-outbreak-of-2014-have-a-lab-origin
Absolutely amazing work! Surely there is nowhere for them to hide after this. But we'll see I guess. I'm still very curious about the media's involvement in all of this. Without the fear campaign raging across all forms of mainstream news, none of this would have happened.
When will MSM be brought down and held accountable????
Ebola effects are pretty much IDENTICAL to arsenic poisoning
To have something to screen someone for something as dangerous as ebola before they became symptomatic and before they entered the country is not a bad thing. It is absolutely a national security issue. You don't want ebola spreading across miliary bases much less the general population. It doesn't mean both things can't be true, that Epstein and his network were looking to profit from pandemic and preparedness was needed as it was a national security risk. As for the political control of the senate, she was right. It would have been bad for Dems if we had an ebola outbreak, just as COVID-19 was bad for Trump's re-election. Of course, the opposition is going to use something like that to their advantage. Every move Trump made during the pandemic was done through the lens on how it would impact his re-election. That has been well documented in books from former Trump staffers.
There is nothing "opaque" about donor advised funds ("DAF"). Easily legally created, the donor funds it with cash or assets, and can only disburse it to 501(c)3 organizations, i.e., charitable organizations.
Seems to me that it is the IRS code, 501(c)3, that is being abused.
This is a provocative thread, and I agree with the underlying instinct to scrutinize power + philanthropy + emergency governance; those ecosystems do create perverse incentives, and sunlight matters.
That said, as a physician-scientist I think it’s crucial not to let legitimate governance critique get fused into biologically implausible or weakly supported biomedical claims.
A few calibrations that would strengthen the argument (and protect readers from misinformation):
1. “Documentary fact” needs primary documents + clear inference steps. If the thesis is “this week ‘activated’ a biosecurity state,” then the post should show (a) the specific DOJ exhibits, (b) what they directly establish, and (c) what is interpretation. Otherwise, the narrative reads more like pattern-matching than proof. 
2. Ebola vaccines can’t ‘give you Ebola.’ WHO is explicit that Ebola vaccination cannot infect you with Ebola because licensed vaccines do not contain live Ebola virus. For ERVEBO, regulators state it contains a different virus vector plus one Ebola protein and cannot cause Ebola disease. 
3. If the piece is going to lean on “Ebola reframed under UN Chapter VII” or “military-grade threat,” it would be helpful to cite the actual UN resolution text and policy documents and keep the biology separate from the politics.
I’m all for auditing conflicts of interest and emergency-power creep. But the argument becomes much stronger (and more trustworthy) when it avoids biomedical “gotchas” and clearly distinguishes what the documents prove from what the author believes they imply.
Thank you for the thoughtful engagement — I genuinely appreciate the care behind it.
A few clarifications that I think matter:
1. The article does not claim that Ebola vaccines "give you Ebola." The piece doesn't discuss Ebola vaccination at all. It examines how Ebola was reclassified as a security threat under UNSC Resolution 2177, and how private networks — documented in newly released DOJ exhibits — were positioned around that governance shift. I'd welcome a re-read with that distinction in mind.
2. On primary documents: every claim in the article is sourced to specific DOJ exhibit numbers (linked and cited), and there is an explicit section — "What This Investigation Does—and Does Not—Claim" — that draws the line between what the documents establish and what they do not. The inference steps are there.
3. On the UN resolutions: the article references both UNSC Resolution 2177 and GA Resolution 69/1 by number, including the Chapter VII framing and the creation of UNMEER.
I share your instinct that governance critique should be rigorous and clearly sourced. That's exactly what this series aims to be. If you see specific claims in the text that you believe are unsupported by the cited documents, I'd be glad to discuss them.
You're so classically allopathic n predictable.
We saw its filthy backsides during the fake Covid n poisonous jab shenanigans and we aren't playing those "stupid" misinformation ( a psyop word that came into our collective consciousness) games anymore.
Enough of it. Any sane human knows where Ebola came from. Go check the timeliness n history yourself but I doubt you'll do that exhaustive research. It all came down to injections given to the people to prevent something else. Thank God we've finally woken and are fully alive to the tricks of peadophilic gates and Epstein mixed with an unhealthy dose of global public health.
We will never bow or comply anymore.
We choose freedom.
We call for all pandemic operators, funders and enablers to be prosecuted.
Thanks
Alright, Sayer, come clean. You using AI to write these? You either have an inhuman ability to research and write, are using AI, or both.