BREAKING: U.S. Plans WHO Withdrawal on Inauguration Day - A Move Toward Health Sovereignty

As Donald Trump’s administration plans a day-one exit from the WHO, U.S. health sovereignty advocates celebrate a pivotal shift towards more localized and holistic health governance.

U.S. Plans WHO Withdrawal on Inauguration Day: A Triumph for the MAHA Movement and U.S. Health Sovereignty

As reported by the Financial Times, Donald Trump’s transition team is set to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO) on the first day of his potential new administration. This anticipated decision is a pivotal moment for the Make American Healthy Again (MAHA) movement and a broader victory for U.S. citizens advocating for more localized control over health decisions. This move aligns with the rallying cry to nominate and confirm Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services, underscoring a significant shift towards health sovereignty and alternative medical practices.

Funding Dynamics and Influence in WHO

Significant funding for WHO from major nations and private entities like Germany, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the United States has been crucial in the WHO’s ability to address (and critics would say blow out of proportion) global health emergencies. However, this substantial financial influence has raised concerns about the alignment of WHO policies with individual nations' health autonomy and public interests^[1].

Implications of Withdrawal on Health Sovereignty

The "EXIT THE WHO" campaign by Stand for Health Freedom (SHF) underscores a growing concern among U.S. citizens regarding the overreach of global entities into national health policies. SHF highlights critical issues such as:

• Influence Over U.S. Health Policy: Critics argue that WHO’s influence on American health policies undermines U.S. sovereignty, especially when it contradicts localized health needs and practices^[2].

• Concerns Over the Pandemic Treaty: Many in the MAHA and natural and alternative health community view WHO's proposed pandemic treaty as a mechanism to solidify global authority over national health responses, potentially marginalizing holistic medicine in favor of pharmaceutical-driven approaches^[3].

• Grassroots Mobilization: SHF's advocacy has led to significant grassroots actions, including over 250,000 emails sent to U.S. senators advocating for the passage of the WHO Withdrawal Act (HR79), which calls for national autonomy in health policy^[4].

Watch RFK Jr.’s full digital town hall interview conducted by Stand for Health Freedom here.

Impact on Alternative Medicine and the MAHA Movement

The grassroots movement to reclaim health sovereignty and informed medical choice views the potential withdrawal from WHO as an opportunity to:

• Reduce Reliance on Pharma-Driven Protocols: By distancing U.S. policy from WHO, there may be more room to promote and integrate alternative medical practices.

• Promote Localized Health Decisions: Greater autonomy could lead to better support for personalized medicine practices that cater to individual health needs rather than global mandates.

• Strengthen Health Democracy: Enabling greater citizen and state involvement in health decisions enhances the democratic process within healthcare, ensuring that policies are more directly reflective of the populace’s needs and values.

Rallying for RFK Jr. as HHS Secretary

In conjunction with the withdrawal from WHO, the MAHA movement and other health sovereignty advocates are rallying for the nomination and confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services. Supporters believe RFK Jr.'s leadership could profoundly impact the promotion of health freedom and the integration of alternative health practices at a national level. Those interested in supporting this cause can contact their senators through the Stand for Health Freedom campaign page: Support RFK Jr. for HHS Secretary.

GreenMedInfo.com: A Beacon of Health Freedom and Advocacy

GreenMedInfo.com has been a pivotal platform in the health freedom movement since its inception in 2008. As a leading resource offering global free access to natural health science, it has reached over 250 million organic visitors, providing well-researched data and publications on the benefits of natural medicine and the potential risks associated with conventional medical treatments. Despite facing substantial international criticism and deplatforming challenges during the Covid-19 pandemic, GreenMedInfo.com has remained steadfast in its mission to enlighten the public about the dangers of hastily approved medical interventions, such as the mRNA vaccines.

During the pandemic, GreenMedInfo.com was among the first to caution the public about the mRNA vaccines, which were being promoted by WHO and various national and global health bodies as "safe and effective." Their critical reporting highlighted discrepancies in vaccine safety data and raised questions about the transparency and reliability of official health communications. This stance drew significant attention and led to deplatforming attempts aimed at silencing their advocacy for health transparency and informed consent.

For those interested in understanding more about GreenMedInfo.com's vision and the challenges they've faced in striving to uphold the principles of health freedom, a detailed video on their website describes their mission and ongoing efforts to provide access to health knowledge that is often marginalized or ignored by mainstream health sources below.

Not yet a member of our global community of health enthusiasts? Learn more here

Conclusion: A Step Toward a Healthier Democracy

The potential withdrawal from WHO and the nomination of RFK Jr. represent significant steps toward respecting and integrating diverse health perspectives that are often overlooked in global health discussions. For many Americans, particularly those supportive of the MAHA movement, these decisions herald a future where health decisions are more localized, personalized, and aligned with foundational rights and freedoms valued in the United States.

As the landscape of global health governance continues to evolve, these developments will undoubtedly be a topic of keen interest and debate, with significant implications for the formulation and implementation of innovative new health policies, which honor informed medical choice, parental rights, and bodily sovereignty, both nationally and internationally.

Follow and comment on this breaking story on X, with our Thread below:

---

Footnotes:

1. Financial Times, "Donald Trump’s transition team seeks to pull US out of WHO ‘on day one’," accessed [12/22/24].

2. Stand for Health Freedom, "EXIT THE WHO" campaign, Link to campaign.

3. GreenMedInfo, "World Health Organization Pandemic Treaty: Road to Medical Enslavement," Link to article.