Bridging Energy and Information: Codality in an Aetheric Framework

Integrating Physics, Biology, and Consciousness through Information

[Important Note: The following essay represents an unusually abstract and highly theoretical inquiry, distinct from the more accessible pieces typically published here. It forms part of an ongoing collaboration with scientists and philosophers and is offered in its unadapted academic language for those wishing to explore these ideas at their most rigorous depth.]

Abstract: Information and causation represent two complementary modes of interaction in nature, yet modern science lacks a unified framework encompassing both. Codality, introduced by Ji and Davis, denotes information- or code-mediated correlations between objects via a third entity, contrasted with direct energy/force causality[1]. This paper extends the codality framework by positing a fundamental aether as an informational medium that underlies and integrates codality and causality. We review literature across physics, biology, and consciousness studies – from Maxwell’s quaternion electrodynamics and Tesla’s scalar waves to Sheldrake’s morphogenetic fields and DNA communication experiments – to synthesize a new model of “aetheric codality.” In this model, the aether serves as a ubiquitous scalar field that carries informational codes (patterns, blueprints) nonlocally, mediating correlations among physical and biological systems. We propose that codality emerges as structured information within the aether, explaining phenomena ranging from quantum entanglement and nonlocal healing to developmental pattern formation and consciousness beyond the brain. Theoretical integration is followed by implications for quantum biology (e.g. DNA’s scalar signaling, morphogenetic regulation) and consciousness (e.g. brain-aether interfacing, near-death experiences). Finally, we outline experimental validation pathways – including detecting nonlocal entanglement in living systems, scalar coherence in DNA, interferometric EEG correlations, and novel scalar technologies (e.g. RASHA) targeting intronic reprogramming – to test this paradigm. By uniting energy-based causality with code-based codality through an informational aether, we aim to expand the scientific understanding of life and mind as processes in an integrated physical-information continuum.

Introduction

Modern science distinguishes two fundamental ways that elements of the universe influence each other: through energy-mediated causal interactions and through information-mediated correlations. The classical physical worldview (from Newton to Einstein) has been dominated by causality, wherein forces or energy exchanges cause changes in a contiguous chain of events (e.g. one billiard ball striking another)[1]. By contrast, living systems and communication processes often exhibit codality – correlations not easily explained by direct forces, but by shared information or code. Ji and Davis define codality as a code-dependent correlation between objects mediated by a third entity (an informational medium or code)[1]. For example, the genetic similarity between two organisms (such as chimpanzees and humans) is a codal correlation: it arises not from one directly causing the other, but from shared informational templates (DNA code) inherited from a common ancestor[2]. Codality is thus more conspicuous in biology (and possibly consciousness), whereas causality is more pronounced in physics[3].

Despite clear examples of codality – from DNA regulatory codes to synchronized neural patterns – mainstream science lacks a unifying conceptual framework that treats information on equal footing with energy. Ji and Davis have argued that acknowledging codality may resolve certain paradoxes in physics. In particular, they suggest that the famed Bohr–Einstein debate over quantum mechanics (wave-particle duality and nonlocal entanglement) can be reframed: Bohr emphasized dynamic, measurement-dependent aspects of quanta, while Einstein insisted on static, pre-existing elements of reality; each missed the full picture[4]. The codality framework bridges this divide by positing that quantum correlations (entanglement) involve an informational connection (a “code”) linking entangled entities – what they term “spiritual resonance,” isomorphic to quantum entanglement[5]. Such resonance hints at an underlying informational medium enabling instantaneous correlations, beyond classical cause-effect chains.

This paper advances the codality concept by explicitly integrating the long-revoked notion of aether as that informational medium. Historically, the luminiferous aether was proposed as an all-pervasive substratum carrying light waves and forces through space[6]. While the Michelson–Morley experiment (1887) failed to detect aether drift and led to its abandonment in orthodox physics[3], the concept has persisted in various forms – from the quantum vacuum of field theory[4] to “zero-point” fields and modern ether-like models[9]. Here we revive the aether concept not as a material ether wind, but as a universal informational field (or scalar field) that can support codal interactions (information transfer) even without energy exchange in the normal sense.

Crucially, if such an informational aether exists, it could be the “third entity” mediating codality in both physics and biology. Aether would function as a global information reservoir or morphogenetic field in which patterns and correlations are stored and transmitted. Codality would then describe how systems “read” and “write” information in the aether to coordinate with each other, analogous to how computers exchange data over an unseen medium. In this way, causality and codality could be seen as two complementary interactions – energy exchange vs. information exchange – within one unified substrate.

The goals of this interdisciplinary inquiry are therefore: (1) to review evidence and theory for scalar fields and aether as physical constructs, alongside morphogenetic fields and genetic information transfer as biological constructs; (2) to propose a theoretical integration wherein codality is the informational structure of the aether, providing a continuous connection between quantum nonlocality, life’s organization, and consciousness; and (3) to discuss implications for quantum biology and consciousness studies, suggesting how phenomena like nonlocal biological communication, near-death experiences, and mind-matter interaction might be better understood via an aetheric codality. Finally, we delineate validation pathways – experimental approaches (from entanglement tests to biofield measurements and emerging scalar technologies) – that could empirically substantiate or falsify this framework.

By bridging historical physics (Maxwell’s and Tesla’s era of aether and scalar waves) with cutting-edge biophysics (DNA wave communication, biofield science) and consciousness research (the hard problem, NDEs), we aim to lay the groundwork for a more holistic science. This new science recognizes information as a fundamental ontological element, with aether as its medium, codality as its modus operandi, and causality as the energetic mechanism that coexists and interacts with it (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Conceptual triadic schema linking causality (energy/force-based interactions), codality (information/code-based correlations), and aether as the underlying informational medium that interconnects and supports both.

Literature Review

Codality and Information Fields in Physics and Biology

Ji and Davis introduced “codality” to denote information-mediated correlation as distinct from force-mediated causation[1]. Both types of correlation operate in nature, but codality becomes especially salient in contexts where a shared code or pattern links entities without a direct energy exchange. Biology is rich with such examples: the bilateral symmetry in animal body plans, the synchronized firing of distant neural assemblies, or even the parallel evolution of traits in separated species (which some theorists like Rupert Sheldrake attribute to morphic resonance). In these cases, a guiding information pattern seems to coordinate outcomes across space or time.

In their recent work, Ji and Davis argue that codality may be “written into” space-time itself[1]. They speculate that space-time can encode information such that two objects can correlate by accessing that common code[2]. An analogy is how two distant computers synchronize data via a cloud server: the cloud (third-party medium) holds the information that both retrieve, so they can show correlated states without direct contact. Similarly, codality implies an information channel or field that mediates correlations. Traditional physics lacked such a channel; nonlocal correlations (e.g. quantum entanglement) were deemed “spooky action at a distance” by Einstein. But rather than action (force) at a distance, entanglement might be better viewed as correlation at a distance – which naturally invites an informational interpretation. Ji & Davis’s proposal aligns with other quantum interpretations suggesting that information, not just physical signals, underlies quantum connections.

In biological sciences, the concept of information fields has surfaced in several forms. Developmental biologists sometimes invoke “fields” (e.g. positional information fields, morphogen gradients) to explain how cells coordinate during embryogenesis. Beyond mainstream explanations, more speculative ideas include Sheldrake’s morphogenetic fields, which purportedly store the forms and behaviors of past organisms and nonlocally influence present ones. Sheldrake postulates that morphogenetic fields contain all information about an organism’s structure and form, with a holographic distribution (the information is present throughout the field and can be accessed from any point)[5]. These fields are said to be neither electromagnetic nor confined to space-time; rather, they reside in a “higher-dimensional” plane underlying the physical world[11]. While controversial, this view resonates with codality: the morphogenetic field would be the “third entity” carrying the informational code that links, for example, all oak trees or all mice with each other’s developmental patterns. It is essentially an aether of biological information.

In summary, codality literature urges us to treat information as a real causal agency (or more precisely, a correlation agency) in nature. To incorporate this into physics, one needs a medium or mechanism for information transmission independent of energy transfer. This is where revisiting the concept of an aether becomes relevant, as discussed next.

Scalar Fields, Aether, and Longitudinal Waves in Physics

The classical aether was originally conceived as a medium for electromagnetic waves in the 19th century. James Clerk Maxwell’s seminal 1865 paper “A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field” actually formulated electromagnetism in terms of quaternions (a mathematical system extending complex numbers). In Maxwell’s quaternion equations, in addition to the well-known transverse electromagnetic waves, solutions existed that can be interpreted as longitudinal scalar waves[2]. These scalar waves correspond to oscillations in the potential field (or aether) with no transverse electromagnetic polarization. After Maxwell’s death, however, Oliver Heaviside, Heinrich Hertz, and others reduced Maxwell’s 20 quaternion equations to the four vector equations taught today, effectively eliminating the scalar potential terms for simplicity[6]. The result was a theory adept at describing “Hertzian” transverse EM waves, but blind to any longitudinal, nonradiating modes[15][14]. In other words, an entire class of solutions – those potentially corresponding to aetheric scalar waves – was dropped from mainstream consideration. As a 2018 review notes, this reduction “significantly reduced the possibility for a correct theoretical description of scalar waves” in nature[14].

Importantly, Maxwell and many of his contemporaries firmly believed in an aether. Maxwell considered light to be vibrations in “a very rarefied and highly elastic substance” filling space[2]. Nikola Tesla, who later pioneered wireless power, was even more explicit: “Light cannot be anything else but a longitudinal disturbance in the ether, involving alternate compressions and rarefactions. In other words, light can be nothing else than a sound wave in the ether.”[7]. Tesla’s experiments in Colorado Springs (1899) demonstrated transmission of electric signals without conventional electromagnetic radiation losses – he reported producing stationary waves that could propagate with little attenuation around the Earth[7]. These he referred to as non-Hertzian waves or “Tesla waves,” which modern interpreters identify as scalar longitudinal waves in the electrodynamic medium[7]. Tesla also observed phenomena suggesting superluminal effects, consistent with the idea that in a true elastic medium, longitudinal modes could propagate faster than transverse light-speed waves (indeed, one reason physicists of his time resisted aether was the fear that longitudinal modes in a gas-like ether would allow infinite propagation speed, violating relativity[19][16]).

Over the 20th century, the aether concept was set aside, but it has never entirely vanished. Instead, it transformed: the quantum vacuum in quantum field theory can be viewed as a modern ether – a substrate filled with fluctuating fields and virtual particles. Some contemporary physicists and engineers (often outside the mainstream) have revived the idea of scalar or longitudinal electrodynamic waves that couple to the vacuum. For example, Whittaker (1903) showed mathematically that any static potential could be decomposed into a combination of bi-directional wave pairs, hinting that what we call “scalar potential” might hide structured waves. In recent literature, Kosich (2023) describes scalar waves as “longitudinal oscillations in the quantum field” that interact directly with the vacuum and can carry energy and information in novel ways[8]. Scalar waves, lacking orthogonal E and B field components, are not constrained by the classical speed-of-light limit or inverse-square attenuation in the same way as standard EM waves[22][23]. They are sometimes said to fill space like a field “pressure” rather than a propagating transverse ripple[24], which aligns with older notions of an etheric stress or potential field.

Because of the mainstream skepticism, much of the research on scalar waves and aether has occurred at the fringes, but there are notable contributors: Thomas E. Bearden has written extensive theoretical works arguing that Heaviside’s removal of scalar terms obscured a whole “subspace” of vacuum energy that can be tapped via longitudinal waves[9]. Bearden and colleagues have posited mechanisms by which two opposite-phase electromagnetic waves can cancel their fields but produce a latent scalar field (sometimes called a “potential” wave) in space[9]. Indeed, when two coherent EM waves meet in perfect destructive interference, classical theory says their fields cancel and energy is locally eliminated. But the energy must go somewhere – Bearden and Konstantin Meyl propose it is converted into a stress in the fabric of space (the vacuum/aether), i.e. a scalar wave[9]. In this view, the scalar wave carries the energy/information without an observable E or B field, until it finds a receiver where it can re-materialize as conventional energy. This hypothesis has been documented in some peer-reviewed contexts as well; for instance, a study in the International Journal of Applied and Advanced Scientific Research reports that bringing two out-of-phase bioelectric fields (from a person’s left and right hands) together creates the conditions for scalar wave formation[10]. The measurable effects (thermal changes, magnetic field perturbations) in such “prayer hands” experiments are consistent with the generation of a novel field, not explained by standard electromagnetic theory[10.

Overall, the literature suggests the following picture: Aether (or the quantum vacuum) is an information-rich medium, and scalar waves are its communication mode. They are often described as longitudinal pressure waves in the medium of space, analogous to sound waves in air. Unlike transverse EM waves that require no medium (hence no aether in modern view), scalar longitudinal waves demand a medium – and thus their existence would imply the existence of an aether-like substrate. The elimination of aether in the 20th century might be seen as a tactical simplification to save relativity from superluminal troubles[7], but if nature does utilize longitudinal information waves, then a revival of the aether concept is inevitable. Crucially for our thesis, scalar/aether waves carry both energy and information, whereas normal EM waves carry energy but little encoded information unless modulated. As Rivera-Dugenio puts it, “unlike electromagnetic waves that only transport energy, scalar waves carry both information and energy”. This makes them ideal candidates for mediating codality. We next explore how such scalar information waves appear to operate in biological contexts, notably in genetics and development.

Morphogenetic Fields and Scalar Information in Biology

The hypothesis of morphogenetic fields – organizational fields that guide the form and behavior of living organisms – was first articulated in the early 20th century (by Gurwitsch’s embryonic fields, etc.) and later popularized by Rupert Sheldrake. While traditional biology explains development through gene regulation and biochemical signaling, morphogenetic field theory posits an additional layer: a field containing the positional and structural information for form-building. Sheldrake’s model suggests that these fields have a memory (inherent through repetition by many previous similar organisms) and that they influence matter by imposing patterns upon otherwise random or purely chemically driven processes[5]. Notably, Sheldrake’s fields are said to be non-electromagnetic and nonlocal. In his view, each species has its own field, and even each organ or behavioral pattern has a field that orchestrates how it unfolds. Experimental evidence for morphogenetic fields remains controversial (e.g. tests of whether separated populations of organisms “learn” behaviors faster if others have already learned them), but the concept elegantly aligns with codality: the field is effectively the “code space” connecting instances of a form.

Recent interdisciplinary work has tried to bridge morphogenetic fields with physics by invoking scalar field mechanisms. Rivera-Dugenio (2015, 2019) in developing a scalar-morphogenetic field model, cites Sheldrake’s ideas and extends them with the notion of an active information medium[11][13]. In his description, the morphogenetic field is holographic and “omnipresent in the universe” such that any location can access the information with the right tuning. This sounds abstract, but there are concrete technological analogies: a hologram allows any fragment to reconstruct the whole image because the information is distributed; similarly, the field storing an organism’s form could be accessed by any of its parts. Rivera-Dugenio further connects this to physics via the work of Burkhard Heim, a physicist who proposed extra dimensions beyond space-time. Heim’s framework (often called Heim theory) suggested that additional coordinates encode informational parameters that influence processes in our 4D world[13][15]. In other words, what we perceive as physical causation might be controlled from a higher-dimensional “information space” – a conception quite similar to the aether as an informational field.

From a practical standpoint, if morphogenetic or informational fields exist, how might they communicate with the biochemical realm? One proposal gaining traction is scalar wave signaling at the cellular and molecular level. The idea is that biological structures, especially the DNA, can send and receive scalar (longitudinal) waves that carry morphogenetic information. There is a lineage of research supporting this:

• In the 1980s, Soviet and German researchers (e.g. Fritz-Albert Popp, Pjotr Gariaev) discovered that DNA can emit and absorb photons (“biophotons”) in a coherent manner, suggesting it as an electromagnetic transmitter/receiver. Gariaev went further to propose “wave genetics,” where genetic information can be communicated by electromagnetic and acoustic waves. Grazyna Fosar and Franz Bludorf reported that human language can modulate genetic function, indicating DNA’s sensitivity to frequency and words[16]. They pointed to the fact that 90% of DNA is non-protein-coding “junk” DNA, hypothesizing it serves as a data storage and communication medium[16]. Gariaev’s experiments (though contentious) included shining laser light through DNA samples modulated with voice recordings and allegedly inducing effects in distant samples – implying some field coupling.

• Professor Konstantin Meyl, a German physicist, provided a theoretical basis for DNA’s scalar activity. Meyl posits that a DNA molecule, with its helical coil and repetitive structure, can generate a magnetic scalar wave that propagates along the axis of the helix [11]. When DNA is active (during transcription/replication), the hydrogen bonds between strands momentarily break; this creates a situation where the base pairs’ electric charges are exposed. Meyl explains that to access those charges, an electric field with radial (longitudinal) lines is needed – essentially a vortex-like field emanating outward. The separation of the DNA strands thus can be driven by or result in a vortex in the electric field around DNA. Because the magnetic field is perpendicular to a changing electric field, this vortex travels in the direction of the DNA’s magnetic vector, forming a longitudinal wave along the DNA axis. In effect, DNA acts as a scalar antenna, emitting and absorbing torsion-like waves. Meyl experimentally reported that these DNA scalar waves can have remarkable propagation speeds and distances (potentially superluminal or at least far-reaching with little attenuation)[12]. He also noted that only scalar (longitudinal) electromagnetic components could penetrate tissues deeply enough to account for certain bioeffects (since normal transverse EM gets damped within millimeters in tissue)[12]. This has been used to explain the success of some frequency therapies which, puzzlingly, affect internal parasites that radio waves couldn’t normally reach[12] – implying a scalar component tunneling through the body.

  

• Another strand of evidence comes from Luc Montagnier, a Nobel Laureate virologist, who in 2011 reported that bacterial DNA sequences could be detected in pure water under certain conditions via electromagnetic signals. In Montagnier’s experiments, dilutions of DNA emitting low-frequency EM waves led to new DNA being synthesized in water that never contained that DNA, when both were exposed to a 7 Hz electromagnetic field[17]. This controversial finding (often dubbed “DNA teleportation” or “wave genetics”) suggests that DNA’s information can be transduced into an electromagnetic (or scalar) signal and retrieved elsewhere. While critics label it pseudoscience, Montagnier’s group published the results in a peer-reviewed context, and they dovetail conceptually with Gariaev’s wave genetics. If a conventional EM explanation is hard to sustain (due to distance and shielding conditions in some setups), one might speculate that a scalar field was the carrier of this genetic information, with the 7 Hz field serving as a coupling trigger.

• Cell-to-cell communication at a distance (without chemical diffusion or contact) has also been observed in certain cases. For example, Italian researcher Carlo Ventura demonstrated that stem cells in separate chambers can synchronize their fate decisions (differentiation) in the presence of coherent electromagnetic fields, hinting at a field-mediated information exchange (though not necessarily scalar, it invites that interpretation). Another classic observation is the so-called “phantom leaf” effect where a Kirlian photograph of a leaf shows the outline of a missing part as if the field of the leaf persists – anecdotally supporting an idea of a field blueprint.

Sheldrake’s morphogenetic fields, in light of these, could be viewed not as abstract, but potentially grounded in physics via scalar waves. Sheldrake himself speculated that biological form might involve fields beyond the electromagnetic; scalar fields provide a concrete candidate. Indeed, in Rivera-Dugenio’s scalar morphogenetic mechanics, the morphogenetic field is explicitly tied to a scalar information structure (sometimes termed the “unified field”) that is accessed nonlocally during phenomena like near-death experiences. In that model, intron DNA (the noncoding majority of our genome) is considered a likely interface to the morphogenetic info-field[13]. Introns had been labeled “junk,” but evidence now suggests they play regulatory roles. Scalar field theory goes further: introns might be intentionally “non-coding” so that they can serve as resonant receptors for incoming information signals, without being locked into producing proteins. They would be the neutral space where a scalar wave can form “between two identical segments of two cells,” enabling those cells to resonate and exchange information. In the presence of scalar waves, DNA in different cells (even distant ones) might resonate together, attracting both energy and information from each other and their environment. This could explain puzzling coordination like swarming behaviors or synchronous firing in separated neurons. It also reframes evolution: introns facilitating scalar communication means that organisms might adapt not only via random mutation, but by exchanging adaptive information through the field (though this is speculative).

To summarize, a consistent thread emerges: biological systems seem to utilize field-based information transfer, likely via scalar-like waves, to coordinate at multiple scales. Morphogenetic fields would be an organism-scale manifestation of this, whereas DNA scalar waves are a molecular-scale mechanism. Both imply an informational aether at work in living systems.

Consciousness and the Informational Aether

If an informational aether underlies both physics and biology, what are the implications for consciousness? Consciousness has the hallmarks of codality: our thoughts can affect our body and perhaps distant systems not through direct energy, but via meaning and information. Numerous phenomena in consciousness studies hint at nonlocal information exchange: telepathy, presentiment (feeling events before they occur), mind-matter interaction (psychokinesis), etc. Mainstream neuroscience struggles to accommodate these, but an aetheric codality model provides natural hypotheses.

First, consider the human brain as a scalar interferometer. Nikola Tesla speculated that with its two hemispheres, the brain could function akin to a radio interferometer, capable of both generating and detecting scalar waves[7]. This startling idea finds resonance in modern neurophysiology: the brain is an electrical organ with myriad oscillating circuits (neuronal networks) and dendritic structures that could create interference patterns. Rivera-Dugenio elaborates that the brain “repetitively creates patterns of scalar waves via the activity of thought”. When the two hemispheric signals cancel in certain ways, they may launch a scalar wave into the aether that is not confined by the skull. Likewise, the brain might receive scalar perturbations from the field, manifesting as intuitions or images. Such a mechanism offers a plausible explanation for telepathy or distant sensing: if two brains become tuned (through intention, training, or perhaps quantum entanglement of brain states as some have hypothesized), scalar waves generated by one could be directly picked up by the other. Unlike normal sensory communication, this would not diminish with distance nor be blocked by Faraday cages. Indeed, empirical research has shown that distant healing intentions can affect targets even when electromagnetic shielding is in place, suggesting a non-EM coupling. In one experiment, healers were able to influence the growth of cell cultures shielded in mu-metal (which blocks magnetic fields) and copper Faraday cages]. Such effects strongly imply an information transfer mechanism outside the EM paradigm – consistent with scalar/aether fields.

Second, the nonlocal aspects of consciousness are dramatically highlighted by near-death experiences (NDEs). In an NDE, a person in clinical death (no heartbeat, no brainwave activity) reports vivid conscious experiences, often including veridical perceptions of events or objects at a distance from their body. A famous prospective study by van Lommel et al. (2001) found that 18% of cardiac arrest survivors had detailed NDEs despite flatlined EEGs, and some recounted accurate details of their resuscitation or happenings elsewhere[18]. No physiological or pharmacological explanations (oxygen deprivation, drugs, etc.) correlated with who had an NDE or the depth of experience. The researchers concluded that consciousness can be experienced during a period of clinically undetectable brain activity, and that memory of such events can later be reported[19]. This is deeply puzzling for a materialist view that brain circuitry alone produces consciousness. However, if consciousness is partly an information field phenomenon (with the brain normally acting as a receiver or transceiver of mind), then during NDE the “receiver” is briefly disengaged from the body and attuned to the aetheric field. The aetheric codality model would assert that each individual’s mind is not confined to neurons, but also exists as a pattern in the informational aether – a sort of standing scalar wave configuration attached to that person’s morphogenetic field. Under extreme conditions like clinical death, the mind’s connection to the brain loosens but does not cease; the person’s awareness shifts predominantly to the aetheric medium, explaining heightened and expansive conscious experiences (including encountering distant scenes or even transcendent realms). These ideas align with what some physicists like David Bohm and neuroscientist Karl Pribram have suggested – that the brain might be accessing a holographic information domain beyond itself, and that consciousness has a nonlocal component.

Moreover, experiments by researchers such as Michael Persinger have attempted to demonstrate entanglement-like correlation between brains. In one series, two individuals in sensory-deprived chambers were exposed to identical low-frequency magnetic field patterns. Surprisingly, when one subject was shown a flashing light (evoking an evoked potential in EEG), the distant subject’s EEG showed a similar potential at the same time – as if the stimulus effect was shared nonlocally (Persinger’s group referred to this as “quantum-like entanglement of brain activity”)[20]. Although the results are debated, they hint that under certain conditions, brains may synchronize via an unseen connection, possibly through scalar fields created by the phase-locked EM patterns (Persinger’s method essentially tries to create a standing interference pattern, a condition for scalar wave generation, between two brains). If reproducible, this supports the notion that the aetheric field can carry neurological information between individuals. Similar claims have been made about long-distance EEG coherence in twins or long-term meditation partners, and even about random number generators being influenced by collective human focus or emotion (as seen in the Global Consciousness Project)[22]. All these phenomena remain on the fringe of acceptance, yet their accumulation points toward the need for a new paradigm: one that accepts that mind is more than neural firings – it is also an excitation of an informational field that pervades space.

In esoteric terms, this sounds akin to an “astral body” or “spirit form”; interestingly, Rivera-Dugenio’s model explicitly delineates multiple forms of human existence – an eternal spirit form, a dark-matter subtle form, a finite light (electromagnetic) form (soul), and the physical body. The “spirit form,” in his description, is composed of “pure consciousness radiation… an infrasound-radiation E-TH-ER substance”. This essentially identifies the conscious self with an aetheric substance vibrating at infrasonic (very low) frequencies of some primordial field. While such language goes beyond mainstream science, it intriguingly meshes with the idea that the seat of consciousness is an aetheric codal pattern, of which the brain is a transducer. Thus, consciousness studies, long stuck between unprovable metaphysics and unsatisfactory reductionism, might find fresh ground in an informational aether framework that is open to empirical testing.

To sum up this section: the incorporation of aether as an informational medium provides a promising lens to interpret consciousness phenomena – from the ordinary (cognitive processes as field interactions) to the extraordinary (psi phenomena, NDEs) – in terms of codality. The mind could be seen as a complex scalar wave standing pattern within an aetheric “consciousness field,” interfacing with the neural brain via resonance. Each thought might be a modulation in the scalar field structure, which in turn influences the body’s bioelectric activity (and vice versa). In this model, intention becomes a physics concept: a directed configuration of aetheric potential that can imprint outcomes. Indeed, experiments show that conscious intention can measurably affect physical systems (e.g. random number generators, crystallization of water, etc.), which suggests consciousness can organize information in the underlying field that then biases material processes. The scalar field hypothesis, by providing a carrier for such subtle influences, demystifies how these intentions could traverse space or bypass normal energetic thresholds (for example, how mere thoughts by a practitioner could influence a cell culture’s growth rate – something observed in placebo and healing studies).[22]

Having laid out the integrated theoretical picture – of codality and causality unified via an informational aether, with applications to life and mind – we now turn to concrete pathways to validate or explore this model scientifically.

Theoretical Integration: Codality as the Informational Structure of Aether

Bringing together the threads from the literature, we propose a theoretical synthesis depicted conceptually in Figure 1: Aether, Codality, and Causality form a triad. In this triad, causality occupies the material-energy corner (the realm of forces, particles, and transfers of energy), codality occupies the informational corner (the realm of patterns, codes, and correlations), and aether is the apex (the foundational medium that permeates reality and enables the other two to interact).

At its core, this framework asserts: The aether is an informational field (or scalar field) whose excitations and configurations correspond to codal relationships. Whereas excitations of conventional fields (electromagnetic, gravitational, etc.) manifest as energy transfer and forces (causal effects), excitations of the aether manifest as information transfer and correlations (codal effects). In other words, codality is how the aether communicates, while causality is how ponderable matter-energy interacts, and the two are coupled through shared aetheric structure.

Let us break down the key principles of this integrated model:

• Dual Attributes of “Quons”: Ji & Davis used the term “quons” for quantum entities, emphasizing they have both static (informational) and dynamic (energetic) attributes[4]. In our interpretation, a quantum particle is not just a point with energy and momentum; it also has a “standing wave” pattern in the informational aether which encodes its potential states. Measurement interactions (causal events) disturb this equilibrium, collapsing possibilities, but the underlying codal pattern in the aether can give rise to entanglement and other correlations when multiple quons share a linked pattern. Entanglement then can be seen as two particles sharing a portion of a joint aetheric information pattern – thus when one is measured, the codal constraint instantaneously affects the other (no energy needed to travel; the information was encoded in the common aetheric wavefunction). This picture aligns with David Bohm’s view of an implicate order (hidden information layer) connecting entangled particles, and resolves the EPR paradox by positing that the “separation” of entangled particles is illusory at the information level[24]. They are one system in the aether, hence measuring one reveals the state of the whole.

• Morphogenetic Code in Aether: The body plan of an organism, or the regenerative plan for healing tissues, is proposed to exist as an interference pattern in the aether that the biological system tunes into. Developmental cues (chemical gradients, gene expression cascades) are the causal execution of instructions, but the blueprint (the target form) may be stored nonlocally. This could explain the classic experiments of embryology where transplanted tissues sometimes still differentiate according to the original body’s plan (the field follows them), or conversely, how a limb knows to grow back to the right shape (as in salamander regeneration) – the information of the full limb is still “in the field” even if half is removed. Codality in this context is the correlation between cells across the developing embryo such that they form a coherent whole; the aetheric field (morphogenetic field) is the medium carrying that coordinating code. A testable consequence is that disrupting the field (perhaps by perturbing ambient scalar conditions) should produce developmental anomalies even without genetic mutation – something that could be investigated by exposing developing organisms to strong scalar wave influences and looking for pattern defects or alterations.

• Brain-Aether Coupling: The brain’s complex electromagnetic activity can be seen as both a producer and receiver of codal patterns in the aether. The theory suggests that memory might have dual storage: synaptic (physical) and field (nonlocal). This resonates with phenomena like savants or sudden acquisition of knowledge without learning, which some attribute to tapping a collective information field. In normal terms, it provides a possible solution to the binding problem in neuroscience: how disparate neural activities unify into one coherent perception. If the brain’s EM rhythms become phase-synchronized (bound) through a common scalar field hologram, then the person experiences a unified scene or thought. The aether in the brain could thus be what “binds” visual, auditory, and cognitive elements into one experience by aligning their informational content in a common field structure.

• Energy-Information Conversion: A crucial aspect of uniting causality and codality is explaining how energy and information interchange. Our model posits that energy can be transduced into information, and vice versa, via scalar interactions. For example, two opposite electromagnetic waves (energy) meet and yield a scalar perturbation (information)[25]. Conversely, when a scalar wave impinges on matter, it can release energy in a detectable form (as many anecdotal scalar device reports claim – e.g. scalar waves causing heating or lighting LEDs in target objects without conventional EM). This is akin to how a radio antenna (structure in a field) picks up a radio wave (energy) and turns it into meaningful signal (information). In biological systems, structures like microtubules, membranes, and DNA might be nature’s “antennas” converting energy fluctuations into biological information (triggering pathways), and likewise converting bio-information (intention, biochemical states) back into subtle energy emissions (biophotons, scalar waves). Glen Rein’s Crystalline Transduction Theory is relevant here: he proposed that liquid crystals in cell membranes and solid crystals in tissues (like apatite in bone or calcite in the pineal gland) could transduce scalar energy into ordinary EM energy and vice versa[25]. This provides a mechanism by which a scalar aetheric signal (say, a healing intention) could manifest as a biochemical change (perhaps by affecting calcium signaling via the membrane crystals). Rein’s cell experiments indeed showed scalar fields altering neurotransmitter release in isolated neurons[25], supporting this transduction concept.

Overall, the integrated theory can be summarized in one phrase: “The aether is the universal codec.” It encodes information that orchestrates matter (codality), and it carries latent energy that can manifest when decoded (causality). By viewing physical law and biological organization through this dual lens, many otherwise disparate phenomena gain a common explanatory ground.

In formal terms, one could attempt to extend existing physical theory to embody these ideas. For example, one might extend Maxwell’s equations with an added scalar potential equation (as was originally present) and introduce coupling terms to biological charge distributions. One could incorporate an informational term in quantum mechanics – perhaps akin to Bohm’s quantum potential or an added term to the Schrödinger equation that accounts for self-organizing information (some authors have tried adding imaginary terms to represent information flow). While those mathematical developments are beyond the scope of this paper, they are conceivable directions.

Crucially, this theory does not abolish or replace conventional physics or biology; rather, it augments them. Just as quantum physics reduced to classical physics at large scales, the codal/aetheric effects might usually average out or remain subtle under normal conditions, making Newtonian and Darwinian descriptions mostly valid. But in special conditions – extreme coherence, strong intention, far-from-equilibrium states – the aetheric codality effects become non-negligible, and then we see what we call “anomalies” or miracles of biology. Our framework provides a continuous path to include those anomalies in science without shrugging them off as superstition.

The next section will illustrate specific implications of this framework, showing how it can illuminate findings in quantum biology and consciousness research, and we then propose experimental strategies to further test these bold claims.

Implications for Quantum Biology

Quantum biology is an emerging field demonstrating that quantum effects (coherence, tunneling, entanglement) occur in living systems under ambient conditions. The informational aether concept can enrich quantum biology by providing a medium for sustained coherence and long-range coupling:

• Enzymes and Metabolism: Enzymatic reactions sometimes exhibit tunneling (e.g. proton or electron tunneling) that vastly accelerates reaction rates. If the active site of an enzyme is seen as a local structured field, one could imagine that it “pre-solves” the reaction in the information domain (a codal alignment of reactant and product states), allowing the reaction to proceed with lower activation energy. This could be framed as the enzyme tapping into an aetheric information of the correct transition state. Moreover, metabolic networks might coordinate via field effects – perhaps explaining observations of oscillatory synchronization in metabolic cycles across a cell.

• Photosynthesis: It is known that photosynthetic complexes maintain excitonic coherence across multiple chlorophyll molecules to efficiently funnel energy (a phenomenon confirmed by ultrafast spectroscopy). How this quantum coherence persists at warm temperatures is an open question. The codal aether model suggests that the morphogenetic field of the plant includes a template for energy transfer – effectively, the plant’s aetheric field “holds” the wave-like state linking the chlorophylls. This could stabilize quantum coherence by constantly providing information about phase alignment. Testing this might involve seeing if an isolated photosynthetic complex’s coherence time is extended when in proximity to other live cells or a whole plant (implying the field of the organism reinforces coherence).

• Animal Navigation: Many animals (birds, turtles) navigate via sensing Earth’s magnetic field or possibly even more obscure cues. Quantum biology has proposed a radical-pair mechanism in bird retinas that might be quantum entangled and sensitive to magnetic fields. If we include aether, we might ask: are these organisms tuning into an information grid? Anecdotally, some animals can find home over distances too great for direct sensory cues, which could imply a nonlocal spatial information field (an “earth morphic field”). The aether might carry imprinting of locations (think ley lines or geometric resonances) that animals with certain biological “antennas” (like magnetite crystals or pineal organs) can read.

• DNA as Quantum Antenna: The DNA double helix, as discussed, could be a macroscopic quantum object. There is speculation that base pairs might even become entangled or that DNA can carry quantum states along its length (Meyl’s scalar wave is essentially that). Our framework strengthens that by adding that the noncoding introns serve as a tuning circuit for the aetheric field. If introns hold no fixed genetic code, they might be free to oscillate or form coherent domains. The implication is that the state of one cell’s DNA could influence another’s via field resonance. This might be involved in phenomena like the so-called “DNA phantom effect,” where a DNA sample is removed but its electromagnetic signature appears to persist in the space (as detected by scattering light anomalies, per Gariaev’s reports). In our terms, removing the physical DNA doesn’t immediately collapse the aetheric pattern it established; thus, the codal “ghost” remains until it gradually dissipates.

• Epigenetics and Development: Epigenetic changes (like DNA methylation patterns) can be influenced by environmental factors and even conscious states (stress, meditation have epigenetic correlates). The aetheric model implies an organism’s informational field might directly affect gene expression, beyond biochemical pathways. For instance, an intentional focus on healing might trigger field configurations that locally alter chromatin states to activate repair genes – essentially mind (via aether) influencing matter (gene switches). Interestingly, experiments have shown that scalar fields can activate DNA repair enzymes: Puharich and colleagues reported that exposing E. coli bacteria to a Tesla-based scalar field activated the gene RAD-6, increasing production of ubiquitin (a protein for DNA repair)[21]. This suggests scalar information can upregulate protective functions. Imagine applying this to regenerative medicine: a properly patterned scalar field (perhaps generated by a device or even collective intention) could instruct cells to revert to a growth/healing mode by modulating epigenetic markers.

In all these examples, the presence of an aetheric information field offers explanations for efficiency, coordination, and adaptive feedback in biology that otherwise seem improbably “smart” for molecules alone. It paints life as actively engaging with a holistic field that transcends the local boundaries of the body – aligning with many holistic healing traditions and emerging scientific observations.

Implications for Consciousness Studies

For consciousness, some implications have already been touched on, but to gather them:

• Mind-Brain Relationship: Accepting an informational aether means consciousness is not identical to brain electrical activity, but rather the brain is a receiver/translator of an aetheric mind signal (a form of dualism that is interactive, akin to filter or transmission models of the brain). This implies death or severe brain damage might disconnect or limit the receiver, but the signal (mind) persists in the field – consistent with NDE accounts and claims of mediums or reincarnation memories (if the information field carrying identity can impress upon another brain later). While these topics are beyond hard science, the model at least provides a framework to rigorously consider them under physics laws (e.g., one could model a personality as an attractor in a complex scalar field, which can in principle latch onto a new brain under some conditions).

• Parapsychology Integration: Phenomena labeled psi (telepathy, clairvoyance, psychokinesis) become more palatable to investigate, since we’d have a hypothesized carrier (scalar waves through the aether) and mechanism (information resonance). For instance, remote viewing (the ability to perceive distant places or targets) could be theorized as the brain tuning to the aetheric signature of a location. A controlled prediction: if remote viewing is real and uses scalar coupling, a location heavily shielded or energetically imbalanced might be “harder” to view. Some accounts from remote viewers say metal enclosures or chaotic environments are more difficult, which would align with aetheric disruption. Psychokinesis (mental influence on objects) would involve imparting structured information to a system to bias outcomes (like influencing random events to be slightly non-random). Field-wise, the person’s aetheric field overlaps with the target system’s field and imposes a pattern (like imprinting intention on an REG machine so that its bit-flips deviate from 50/50). Indeed, experiments by Princeton’s PEAR lab found small but significant deviations in random devices correlated with human intention, and these devices were often shielded, ruling out normal EM influence. The aetheric model would straightforwardly accommodate those results.

• Healing and Medicine: If consciousness and biofields can impact each other via aetheric codality, then modalities like energy healing, prayer, or scalar wave therapy (e.g., Tesla coils, Rife machines, etc.) might operate by modulating the patient’s morphogenetic field to encourage healing. Scalar medical devices are already being developed. For example, the CyberScan device mentioned by Rivera-Dugenio reads a patient’s biofield from a DNA sample and creates a “scalar-information remedy” to restore balance. It uses a Tesla coil to nullify ambient EM fields and produce a pure scalar field during analysis. This approach, while unconventional, matches our theory: by immersing the system in a scalar field, one accesses the aetheric information more directly, then one can imprint corrective code (frequencies corresponding to healthy patterns) back into the patient’s field. The RASHA technology is another example – it generates scalar plasma waves encoded with Base-12 frequency sets intended to communicate with intron DNA and reprogram the morphogenetic field. Such tools claim to induce deep autonomic relaxation and even DNA changes by aligning the body’s field to a more coherent template. These claims remain to be validated in rigorous trials, but early reports of benefits suggest that at minimum, physiological stress indices (heart rate variability, EEG coherence) improve during sessions, consistent with the idea of resonant field tuning.

• Cosmic Consciousness and Scale: Taking a broader view, if aether is truly universal, it could be the medium of a collective consciousness or Akashic record (a term from mysticism for a cosmic memory field). Some physicists (like Ervin Laszlo) have proposed the “Akasha field” as an informational backdrop of the universe where all information is conserved. In our scientifically grounded variant, all minds are localized patterns in the grand aether, and just as particles can entangle, perhaps minds can entangle or share information nonlocally. This might one day be tested by looking for correlated brain activity or subjective reports between people who consciously attempt to link (e.g., long-term meditators claiming oneness experiences). If an aetheric link forms, there might be measurable synchronization in physiological parameters beyond chance – an experiment some researchers have attempted with mixed results. Our framework encourages refining such experiments, using, for example, people in electromagnetically isolated rooms but introducing a scalar coupling device (like phase-locked coils) to facilitate an aetheric link and seeing if that increases the rate of telepathy or shared perceptions.

In essence, embracing an informational aether in consciousness studies encourages a paradigm shift: from consciousness generated by the brain, to consciousness coupled to the brain. It calls for research that is transdisciplinary – involving physics (to handle the field aspects), biology (to handle the living systems coupling), and psychology (to handle subjective correlates). The payoff would be enormous: not only explaining mysterious phenomena but potentially harnessing them (imagine reliable telepathic communication devices based on scalar fields, or mind-controlled healing of one’s own tissues via learned field modulation).

Before such applications can be realized, however, much foundational work is needed. We now outline experimental and validation pathways that could provide evidence for or against the presence of an informational aether and its role in codality.

Validation Pathways and Experimental Approaches

While the theory presented is ambitious, it is testable. We propose several pathways to validate the presence of an informational aether and its codal effects:

1. Nonlocal Biological Entanglement Experiments: These involve testing if separated biological systems exhibit correlations indicative of a shared informational field. A possible experiment could use cell cultures or whole organisms that start from the same source (hence might have initially entangled fields). Place them in isolated Faraday cages or even different labs. Introduce a stimulus to one (e.g., a heat shock or toxin) and measure real-time responses in the other for any simultaneous changes. Careful controls (time-shifting trials, randomizing stimuli) would ensure no normal communication path. If aetheric codality is real, we might detect subtle synchronous responses – perhaps in gene expression or metabolic shift – in the distant twin sample. Earlier, we mentioned Persinger’s two-brain EEG experiment; similarly, one could do twin fMRI: have two individuals meditate to “link up,” then startle one with a light flash and see if the other’s visual cortex shows any activation. Such studies have been attempted; a meta-analysis could clarify if results consistently beat chance. A novel twist is to incorporate a scalar wave generator (like a Tesla coil apparatus) that creates a hypothesized channel between the two locations. For instance, two coils set to interfere could be placed with one coil near each subject/culture, attempting to form a “bridge” in the aether. Does this amplify the correlations? If yes, it would strongly support the scalar field mediation hypothesis.

2. Scalar Field Detection and Imaging: A challenge in this domain is measuring scalar fields directly, since by definition they are not easily picked up by standard EM detectors if the E and B cancel. However, creative methods exist. Glen Rein’s work used biological detectors (e.g., measuring changes in nerve cell cultures) as a proxy for scalar fields[25]. One could also use SQUID magnetometers or torsion pendulums that might respond to subtle space perturbations. Another approach is interference imaging: If scalar waves are present, they might produce slight refractive index changes in materials. One could attempt a Michelson interferometer with one arm exposed to a purported scalar wave source and the other shielded, looking for phase shifts. Alternatively, darkfield photography or Kirlian photography enhancements could visualize field patterns around organisms under different conditions (healing intention on vs off, etc.). If an aetheric field carries information, we might see structured patterns (as some claim in aura photography). While these methods tread a fine line between science and fringe, careful calibration and repetition could accumulate evidence that something real is being detected.

3. DNA Scalar Transmission Experiments: Reproduce Montagnier’s DNA wave experiment with more controls. Set up two sealed containers: one with a known DNA sequence in water (source), and one with pure water plus nucleotides and polymerase (target). Surround both with a coil apparatus that can generate either EM noise, pure magnetic fields, or scalar-cancelled fields. If the target yields the DNA (through PCR amplification of the specific sequence) only when scalar-capable conditions are present (e.g., when using opposing coils to cancel EM and produce scalar potential), that would suggest information transfer via the scalar channel. Negative controls with no source DNA or with shielded setups should remain negative. This experiment, if positive, would be groundbreaking, essentially proving an informational transmission independent of classical signals.

4. Intron Activation and Gene Expression under Scalar Fields: Building on Puharich’s result with RAD-6 gene activation, one could systematically expose bacterial cultures (or human cell lines) to scalar wave fields and use RNA sequencing to see if certain genes upregulate compared to controls. If certain stress-response or repair genes reliably change expression only under scalar exposure (with all other conditions identical), it implies a direct line from informational field to genetic regulation. Another test: differentiate stem cells (e.g., prompt them to become neurons) in the presence vs absence of scalar-modulated signals (for instance, modulate a scalar field with patterns derived from brain waves, to see if that biases stem cells to neural fates). If we find that specific informational content in the field can direct cellular outcomes, we have essentially a “wireless epigenetic programming” proof-of-concept.

5. RASHA Technology and Physiological Monitoring: The RASHA scalar-plasma device already claims success in relaxing the autonomic nervous system and affecting DNA via “morphogenetic intron communication”. To validate this, a controlled study can be done. Have participants undergo RASHA sessions while a control group relaxes in a similar environment without the scalar activation. Measure heart rate variability (HRV), EEG coherence, stress hormone levels before and after, and perhaps telomere gene expression or intron-related transcripts in blood cells. If the RASHA truly “reprograms introns,” we might detect changes in expression of transposable elements or noncoding RNAs associated with introns. Even more ambitiously, one could do whole-genome sequencing on tissue before and after a long course of RASHA therapy to see if any mutations or structural changes correlate (as a positive outcome, ideally reversal of DNA damage – though that’s speculative). At minimum, demonstrating a unique physiological state during scalar sessions (different from placebo relaxation) would support that something unconventional is happening, possibly through an aetheric coupling to the body. Rivera-Dugenio’s reports mention “Base-12 frequencies” – one could test different frequency sets to see if the outcomes follow a pattern, thereby characterizing the dose-response of informational frequencies on biology.

6. Pyramid Scalar Experiments: Given interest in pyramidal structures focusing scalar waves[26], one could utilize scaled pyramid models to concentrate ambient aetheric fields and see effects on materials or living tissue. Prior research in the “pyramid power” genre reported things like preserved seeds, changes in water crystallization, etc., but lacked rigorous control. A scientific approach: place identical samples (seeds, water vials, small cell cultures) inside a pyramid frame vs. outside, with randomization, then measure growth rates or molecular changes. If aetheric concentration occurs under the pyramid, we’d expect statistically significant differences. Moreover, one could measure environmental readings at the pyramid apex (where some claim a column of energy forms) using sensitive magnetometers or atmospheric ion detectors. The Bosnian Pyramid measurements found unusual electromagnetic and ultrasound signals at the tip[26] – replicating such measurements on a smaller scale or in other pyramid sites would bolster the idea that geometry can amplify scalar/aetheric fields. If confirmed, it shows that physical structures can interface with the informational field, reinforcing our assumption that engineering the aether is possible (just as antennas interface with electromagnetic fields).

Each of these pathways, if yielding positive results, would incrementally build the case for the informational aether and codality. It is important to also consider falsification: what evidence would refute our framework? If repeated high-sensitivity tests show absolutely no coupling between separated systems beyond known forces, or if devices like RASHA show no effect beyond placebo in well-blinded trials, the notion of a practical aetheric field influencing biology would be weakened. Even so, like any emerging paradigm, initial tests might be noisy; the history of quantum mechanics shows early experiments can be misinterpreted until theory guides better ones. We should thus design experiments that are robust and preferably yield quantifiable effect sizes.

Conclusion and Future Directions

We have endeavored to construct a comprehensive interdisciplinary synthesis – extending Ji & Davis’s codality concept by grounding it in a revived aether paradigm. In this view, codality (information-based correlation) is not an abstract metaphor but a literal physical process, mediated by an all-pervasive informational field (the aether) that complements the energy fields of conventional physics. By embedding codal interactions in an aetheric medium, we unify seemingly disparate phenomena across scales: from quantum entanglement and “spooky” physics, to life’s subtle morphogenetic orchestration, to the extended reach of consciousness.

This framework carries profound implications:

• It suggests that information is as fundamental as matter and energy in the architecture of reality. The laws of physics may need to expand to include information conservation or information forces (much as energy conservation is fundamental). This resonates with the rising view among some theorists that “it from bit” – that the universe might essentially be made of information. Our twist is that this information is not disembodied, but resides in the aether, giving it ontological status.

• It provides a scientific narrative for holism: Parts are connected through wholes (fields) that encode their relationships. Reductionism alone (studying parts in isolation) then becomes insufficient; one must study the field context. For example, the genetic code is not just DNA in a test tube, but DNA plus the aetheric field influences around it. This could revolutionize fields like genetics or neuroscience by introducing new variables (field conditions, cosmic influences, etc.) that were previously ignored but might account for variability or unexplained effects.

• It recontextualizes historically “occult” concepts like aether, vital force, and spiritual fields into scientific language, which could lead to integration of traditional knowledge systems with modern science. Concepts of chi or prana, for instance, might be interpreted as human-perceived aspects of the informational aether flowing through living systems. This could open dialogues between scientists and practitioners of acupuncture, Reiki, qigong, etc., to investigate biofield effects with mutual understanding.

Looking forward, there are several promising avenues for research and development:

Theoretical Development: A formal mathematical model needs to be worked out. This might begin with something like a unification of Maxwell’s equations (including scalar terms) with quantum wavefunctions, or a field theory on an extended space (e.g., 4D space-time + an extra informational dimension). Perhaps tools from quantum information theory can be merged with classical field theory. One intriguing route is to build on the similarity between Maxwell’s equations and fluid dynamics – as some have done to describe aether as a superfluid. If the aether is like a fluid, codal interactions might relate to vortices or patterns in that fluid that have stability (solitons?). In fact, the vortex analogy appeared in DNA (ring vortices forming scalar waves) and Tesla’s writings. So exploring soliton and vortex solutions in extended electromagnetic theory might yield stable informational structures (representing particles or patterns) that could correspond to physical reality.

Technology and Engineering: If scalar waves can carry information efficiently (with potentially superluminal speeds and negligible loss), they could revolutionize communications. Secure, faster-than-light communication – while speculative – is not outright forbidden if using a non-electromagnetic channel (since it might exploit subtleties that don’t violate relativity’s spirit if no causal paradox arises, or if relativity is a special case of aether theory). Already, inventors claim to have devices for scalar communication (sometimes called Tesla radios). Rigorous testing and development could lead to a new class of telecommunication devices that operate through the Earth (as Tesla imagined) with no need for satellites or fiber optics.

In medicine, scalar field therapies might become mainstream. We foresee devices that can scan a patient’s “biofield” (perhaps via quantum resonance or scalar interferometry) to diagnose issues at the informational level before they manifest physically. Treatment could then involve imprinting corrective information into the field (like informing cancer cells of the body’s overall developmental plan so they stop rogue growth). This could be done with frequency signatures, structured light/plasma, or even focused human intention amplified by technology. The RASHA and CyberScan are forerunners of such an approach. As validation grows, regulatory acceptance might follow for certain conditions (e.g., using scalar fields to promote fracture healing or wound repair by enhancing morphogenetic signals).

Consciousness & Computing: An audacious idea is conscious quantum computers or aetheric AI. If mind is field-based, perhaps quantum computers (which inherently use entanglement and superposition) can interface with aetheric information structures. Could we program a quantum system to tap the Akashic field for data? Conversely, could human intention influence qubits reliably? Early experiments have suggested human observers might alter double-slit outcomes at a tiny level – scaling that up with conscious training or hardware that is receptive to aetheric perturbations might integrate human intuition directly into computing.

Philosophical Impact: Adopting an informational aether blurs the line between material and spiritual. It provides a scientific basis for seeing the universe as interconnected and purposefully evolving (since information implies order/purpose, not just random accidents). It could lead to a new philosophical worldview (monistic but dual-aspect: matter and mind as two facets of one essence) that fosters greater synergy between science and spirituality.

In concluding, we emphasize that while the Codality–Aether framework presented is grounded in a broad array of scholarly and empirical sources, it remains a hypothesis that requires rigorous validation. We have cited works ranging from classical physics to modern biophysics and consciousness research to show that this idea, while ambitious, is built upon the accumulation of anomalies and insights at the fringes of multiple disciplines. By connecting the dots – Ji & Davis’s codality, Maxwell and Tesla’s scalar legacy, Sheldrake’s morphic fields, Meyl and Rivera-Dugenio’s scalar biofield theories, and data from NDEs and biofield experiments – we have outlined a possible coherent extension to mainstream science.

The coming decade could be pivotal. As experimental techniques improve and interdisciplinary collaboration increases, the question “Does an informational aether exist?” can be answered with evidence rather than speculation. The ultimate significance of a positive answer cannot be overstated: it would mark a new scientific revolution, one that finally marries the realm of information (meaning, mind, life) with the realm of energy (matter, force) into a single explanatory tapestry. In that tapestry, causality and codality are two threads woven by the loom of the aether – yielding the rich patterns of reality we observe, from the spiral of galaxies to the double helix of DNA to the thoughts dancing in the human brain.

View the full paper by Sungchul Ji and Joshua Davis here.

The REGENERATE YOURSELF Masterclass

Join over 400,000 enrollees who have discovered practical ways to implement these groundbreaking concepts in their daily lives. This comprehensive online program translates cutting-edge science into actionable strategies for optimizing your health through the principles of the New Biology.

Enroll entirely free at: regeneratemasterclass.com Or, get the entire course including advanced modules here now.

Get Sayer Ji’s book REGENERATE in physical, digital or audiobook form, an international bestseller now in 6 languages.

References

1. Ji, S., & Davis, J.J.J. (2025). Causality vs. Codality: Information encoded in space-time. Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research, 16(1), 16–25.

2. Maxwell, J.C. (1865). A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 155, 459-512.

3. Michelson, A.A., & Morley, E.W. (1887). On the relative motion of the Earth and the luminiferous ether. American Journal of Science, 34(203), 333-345.

4. Wheeler, J.A., & Feynman, R.P. (1949). Classical electrodynamics in terms of direct interparticle action. Reviews of Modern Physics, 21(3), 425-433.

5. Sheldrake, R. (1988). The Presence of the Past: Morphic Resonance and the Habits of Nature. New York: Times Books.

6. Heaviside, O. (1893). Electromagnetic Theory. London: The Electrician.

7. Tesla, N. (1900). Colorado Springs Notes, 1899-1900. Nolit, Belgrade (1978 edition).

8. Kosich, M. (2023). The Science Behind Scalar Waves: A Breakthrough in Quantum Physics. Fluid Mechanics: Open Access, 10(5).

9. Bearden, T.E. (1988). AIDS: Biological Warfare. Tesla Book Co.

10. Bharambe, C.M. et al. (2017). Bio-physical interaction of scalar energy on cells. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(1), 215–220.

11. Meyl, K. (2011). DNA – Reading and Writing by Scalar Waves. 2nd World DNA Day Conference Proceedings, Track 2.7, p.101.

12. Meyl, K. (2012). DNA and Cell Resonance: Magnetic Waves Enable Cell Communication. INDEL GmbH.

13. Rivera-Dugenio, J. (2015). Scalar Energy Morphogenetic Field Mechanics, Bio-cybernetic Medicine and NDE: A Dissertation. International Quantum University.

14. Rivera-Dugenio, J. (2019). The Language of Our DNA – Scalar Energy. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications, 3(3), 173–180.

15. Heim, B. (1982). Elementarstrukturen der Materie. Innsbruck: Resch Verlag.

16. Fosar, G., & Bludorf, F. (2001). Vernetzte Intelligenz. Omega Verlag.

17. Montagnier, L. et al. (2011). DNA waves and water. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 306, 012007.

18. van Lommel, P. et al. (2001). Near-death experiences in survivors of cardiac arrest: a prospective study in the Netherlands. The Lancet, 358(9298), 2039–2045.

19. van Lommel, P. (2013). Non-local consciousness: A concept based on scientific research on near-death experiences during cardiac arrest. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20(1-2), 7-48.

20. Persinger, M.A. et al. (2010). Correlated cerebral events between physically isolated subjects exposed to yoked circumcerebral magnetic fields. NeuroQuantology, 8(1), 7–14.

21. Puharich, A. (1988). Scalar Waves and DNA. Proceedings of the US Psychotronics Association.

22. Nelson, R.D. (2019). Connected: The Emergence of Global Consciousness. ICRL Press.

23. Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Routledge.

24. Bohm, D., & Hiley, B.J. (1993). The Undivided Universe. London: Routledge.

25. Rein, G. (1998). Utilization of a cell culture bioassay for measuring quantum field effects. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 12(3), 495–500.

26. Pyramids and Scalar Waves Conference Paper (2018). Discussion on Maxwell's original equations and the removal of scalar components by Heaviside. Global Pyramid Conference Proceedings.