15 Comments
User's avatar
Allen's avatar

Vaccination is like a spell. Only after it dissolves do you see the true madness. To take a young, healthy baby into your hands, and plunge a needle bearing a toxic medley into its flesh, is an act of extraordinary barbarism.

Vaccines are legal poisons repeatedly injected into babies, children, and adults who do not know enough about them to give informed consent. Once you learn what's in them you will never take another vaccine ever again nor allow them to be given to your children.

If we take all the greed and financial incentive out of health care and only do what is in the best interest of health for people, vaccines will be dropped like a hot potato. There is no documented proof that vaccines are of any benefit to humanity. There is however a plethora of proof indicating that vaccines are dangerous and unnecessary.

Anyone who has studied the topic in depth knows that every aspect of the "vaccine story", starting back in the 1800's up to present, is complete fraud. Vaccines have done nothing but harm people and line the pockets of the medical establishment.

There has never been a product of any kind so filled with historical misinformation, purposeful deception and outright fraud. The belief that injecting synthetic chemicals made by habitually criminal companies who profit from perpetual disease somehow produces health is not only ridiculous and unproven— it is a foundational teaching of a dangerous religious cult that western medicine has become.

From their inception to today's mRNA monstrosities vaccines have done nothing but cause massive and systemic harm to the human biological system.

Furthermore the biggest fraud in history might be the medical industrial complex itself.

For the past 100 years and more they've been claiming credit for things that builders, sewerage workers, water treatment plants, gutter designers, roofers, fridge inventors, electricians etc have created.

Starting in the mid-1800s, there was a steady drop in deaths from all infectious diseases, decreasing to relatively minor levels by the early 1900s. The history of that transformation involves famine, poverty, filth, lost cures, eugenicist doctrine, individual freedoms versus state might, protests and arrests over vaccine refusal, and much more.

Today, we are told that medical interventions increased our lifespan and singlehandedly prevented masses of deaths. Vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical interventions are not responsible for the increase in lifespan and the decline in mortality from infectious diseases.

Like virtually all of the history we are indoctrinated with the story of "modern medicine" is a complete fabrication pounded into the heads of people from cradle to grave in order to maintain that corrupt and highly profitable system.

Russell A. Paielli's avatar

Let's hope and pray this trend continues.

Danielle White's avatar

Nothing lasting will change. Pharmaceutical corporations own American politicians alongside Benjamin Netanyahu. Aa soon as Bobby is out it will all reverse because no lasting changes were implemented. I'm with Jon Rappoport of No More Fake News on these subjects. Since Trump's gone crazy the past few months I have zero trust in the administration.

Valerie Bressler's avatar

Agreed, plus, wasn't there just recent news about Trump calling for an end to religious exemptions for vaccines? The guy is a snake oil salesman.

Danielle White's avatar

I haven't heard about it. Ugh.

eileen's avatar

Take him seriously but not literally.

Jef's avatar

I have a quibble with the final line of this substack. what is needed is a movement for complete freedom of using any medical treatments, including cannabis sativa and DMSO to start, for ALL ages.

Dprindle's avatar

Sayer, I appreciate your informative article about the executive order regarding the childhood vaccine schedule. However, I am very surprised that you did not mention Barbara Loe Fisher and her National Vaccine Information Center which, for decades have worked tirelessly to ensure that parents have the right to make informed decisions regarding their children’s health and wellbeing, especially where vaccines are concerned. I’m pretty sure she was in the fight even before RFK and Children’s Health Defense, and I know she preceded Stand for Health Freedom. She deserves to be recognized, too.

Vicki Prindle

Sayer Ji's avatar

Yes, good catch! I’ll add her in now.

Bodhimom's avatar

Thank You for the article. I hope they will do away with the 1986 Act for legal immunity for these companies and developers. That will really make a difference, when we can sue them out of existence.

Michael Kane's avatar

The key to this Executive Order comes down to the CDC Director. According to Dr. Robert Malone, this EO gives the CDC Director strong power to implement a new childhood vaccine schedule. This may be good, but it may not. Time will tell...

eileen's avatar

One thing we have to keep in mind is that it took decades to infiltrate and take over agencies (with Congress' approval). They can't be dismantled overnight. I sympathize with everyone who wants faster action or accountability. However, honoring medical choice while revamping or potentially eliminating the vaccine schedule does two things: it dismantles the police state surrounding vaccines, while allowing for those who want vaccines to get them: a very good first step. It also puts big pharma in notice: if they can read the writing on the wall, they know they will soon have to compete for our health care dollars instead of capturing agencies and use force to get compliance

TrumpRX is not welfare for big pharma. It is taking down the insurance cartel that jacks up the price of healthcare so that you MUST get insurance to just be able to make an office visit to your doctor. It also makes available some therapies with science backing but blacklisted by insurance such as ivermectin. It does this by bypassing insurance.

Even Congressional Democrats are in board with busting the insurance cartel as the administration is now in negotiations with these Democrats to gut one of the provisions of Obamacare: paying subsidies to the insurance companies. Instead pay those directly to the American people so they can use it for their healthcare costs like putting the money in an HSA or FSA.

Henry Pietkiewicz's avatar

Though a welcome move in the right direction, the reduction in the US Childhood Vaccine Schedule is only a first step in the eradication of potential iatrogenic disease in children and adults, brought on by this class of drug products.

A comparison of the US Schedule to other, presumably Developed, nations assumes that because there is some kind of consensus in these nations that de facto this level of paediatric vaccination is the correct level.

Surely a more effective approach would be to compare health outcomes between the US and these nations, and then compare these nations outcomes with those from outlier nations which have even lower levels of childhood vaccinations, while controlling for other factors.

The rationale for this approach is in results from the admittedly small number of studies which show unequivocally that unvaccinated children have better health outcomes than vaccinated children.

Having said that, I appreciate ‘Rome wasn’t built in a day’, and congratulations to all the organisations and personnel that have pushed the boulder this far.

tanya marquette's avatar

There lacking mention of the health of the children being very poor in the vaccinated compared to the non-vaccinated one. At minimum we have 10 such studies with 1000's of children to study over long term. Further, childhood diseases are not killing children in the US. And, critically, there is no mention of the "held Harmless) status granted pharma corps and not Trump is giving them freedom from performing real placebo based studies on their vaccine drugs. Makes this article very weak and questionable.